Initial neighbor activity gave an uncertain 0.4% gain in additive five-day spine retention models across 13 mice
We tested whether initial neighbor activity improves prediction of spine retention after structure and own activity controls. We used 1,404 five-day records from 22 neurons in 13 mice in released binocular visual cortex data. Some spines occur in both intervals. Each test excluded its mouse from model fitting and penalty choice. Additive logistic models used initial spine area, location, calcium activity, trial quality, selectivity, and soma alignment. Adding nearest-neighbor distance, response status, and correlations reduced mean test log loss from 0.63483 to 0.63232. The gain was 0.00251, or 0.40%. Its 95% conditional mouse-resample range was -0.00425 to +0.01153. Five of 13 mice improved. Adding soma alignment after own activity gave a gain of 0.00010, with range -0.00309 to +0.00302. Subsets by age interval, neighbor distance, and somatic response retained wide ranges. Initial event rate was higher in later retained spines in 11 of 13 mice. Thus, the tested neighbor terms gave little clear extra prediction after the stated controls. This result does not reject local plasticity. The ranges keep fitted predictions fixed. Small animal numbers, optical measurements, structural tracking labels, and additive models limit the result. The package has compact input data, source hashes, code, all predictions, full refit checks, figures, and repeat instructions.
dendritic spine · structural plasticity · calcium imaging · spine retention · visual cortex · neighbor activity · animal exclusion · prediction benchmark
References
6- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-60825-y
We use the released spine tracking and calcium measurements and inspect the original methods.
- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28738592.v1
This pinned data version supplies all initial measurements and later structural fate labels.
- usesIn 10 mice, equal mouse weights reduced the early binocular response correlation rise from 0.051 to 0.007 in 81 fixed spine pairs sci:sha256:c97d0624765e841d3140bb78b82cd769c0456156be9391a76acdff689c7019f1
We use its checked nearest-neighbor identities and extraction code for a secondary analysis.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.15475971
We inspect source MATLAB code for tracking, activity measurement, and neighbor summaries.
- doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115861
This related study describes local and somatic organization of visual inputs to dendritic spines.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.46966
This study describes local activity correlations and limits of somatic signal correction.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesIn 13 mice, initial neighboring spine pairs showed no clear excess shared fate under fixed segment turnover counts
We compare our new source extraction with its compact initial records. Its prediction target is individual retention, not joint pair fate.