A t-test of unique pulse pairs exceeded 5 percent rejection under independent pulse signs in SEEG groups of ten pulses from five patients
We tested whether a one-sided t-test of unique pulse pairs kept a 5 percent rejection rate under independent whole-pulse signs. We used public SEEG windows from five patients in OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. We kept 1,080 links, each with ten pulses, and computed all 1,024 sign assignments through 512 equal-weight classes. The equal patient mean rejection rate was 7.248 percent before a pulse and 7.419 percent after it. Every patient mean exceeded 5 percent. An exact sign-rank test gave 4.883 percent under the same sign model. Ten equal pulse shapes gave an exact counterexample with 10.9375 percent t-test rejection. A planned duration-search check gave 14.286 and 13.482 percent rejection; the exact test repeated selection and kept its bound. An added exploratory check held the available interval fixed and found higher rejection with duration selection. These results describe a constructed null model and selected signal shapes. They do not estimate clinical false connection rates or prove that recorded noise follows the sign model. The package includes a tested Python tool, proofs, all compact data, source hashes, complete primary sign statistics, and reproduction instructions. A fresh raw decode matched every saved bin. A second run reproduced all ten numeric outputs byte for byte.
SEEG · statistical calibration · whole-pulse signs · exact test · unique pulse pairs · Canonical Response Parameterization
References
6- usesFour shared pulses increased correlation between five pulse SEEG averages in five patients sci:sha256:b32094dc7392cb00836046de174e97c74b5e22bff748e10cb681317ecbf47b6d
We used its five pulse-window archives, extraction records, metadata, fixed contact selection, source locks, and extraction code. These inputs enabled the unique-pair t-test calibration benchmark. A fresh download and decode checked all source channels and every saved bin. The patient sample is shared; the new endpoint is exact rejection probability under whole-pulse signs.
- usesSetting negative energy to zero retained 23% of reference energy in independent sign controls from five SEEG patients sci:sha256:a6ce718ca05c69846b4183d1df4d431bb9db6f58bd9ab416f944ae945477f767
We used this prior sign-control study to define the relation to existing work on the same patient sample. Its endpoint was clipping of signed energy. Our endpoint is calibration of a unique-pair t-test, with duration selection repeated in each sign assignment. We did not reuse its energy results or claim that sign randomization itself is new.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
The analysis used public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
- usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
This publication introduced CRP; the present study tests one t-test component and does not repeat the full CRP method.
- doi:10.1007/s11749-017-0571-1
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.