We add acceleration shape conditions to an exact test of 141 public SPARC rotation curves. Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) halo acceleration has derivatives with alternating signs. Its divided differences therefore give necessary linear constraints with no halo mass or scale-radius bounds. We add consecutive constraints through orders two, three, and four to the previous spherical cusp class. At three listed speed errors, fixed geometry, and bounded constant baryon masses, the fourth-order exclusion count rises from 16 to 22. Three of the six added cases belong to the fixed 72-galaxy quality subset. A 5 km/s error floor plus allowed distance and inclination changes removes all six additions. The same three prior conflicts remain, including with wider mass bounds or the first retained row removed. We preserve 1,692 new rational score brackets, exact feasible vectors and exclusion weights, public input bytes, source code, and figures. An audit without an optimizer checks all new and 564 prior brackets. Constructed controls and fresh searches also pass. The score is a deterministic interval mismatch, not a statistical significance. Passing these finite conditions does not prove an NFW fit. These results give a useful added test and conditional exclusions; they do not establish a failure of dark matter theory.
Filters: arxiv: astro-ph.CO (Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics) ×
We test whether 141 selected SPARC rotation curves can fit any spherical nonnegative halo for which radius times density does not increase. This class includes every NFW halo without bounds on scale radius or halo mass. Enclosed mass must be a nondecreasing concave function of radius squared. This gives an exact linear feasibility test at fixed speed-error multiplier T. Under fixed geometry, listed errors, and bounded constant baryon masses, 16 curves have T above three. A weaker nonincreasing-density test excludes four, so the new condition adds 12 conflicts. Four primary conflicts occur in a prescribed subset of 72 quality-1 galaxies with inclination below 80 degrees. Adding 5 km/s in quadrature and allowing one listed error in distance and inclination leaves three conflicts and none in that subset. The same three persist with wider mass bounds and, in a separate case, after removal of the first retained row. Their inclinations are 83 to 90 degrees. The original observing paper warns that extinction can affect their inner rise. Two-radius bounds independently exclude the cusp class in all three wide-mass cases. We provide 1,128 exact score brackets, fit witnesses, exclusion certificates, 564 pair bounds, 20 constructed controls, source data, code, and figures. T is an interval mismatch score, not a statistical significance. The result assumes spherical halo forces and fixed baryon profile shapes. It does not prove a finite central density or test an unresolved central cusp alone.
We test how constant shifts between observing fields affect an additive magnitude dipole in the public DES-Dovekie distances. We use all 1,623 DES events at a fixed release commit, exact event positions, and the marginal statistical and systematic covariance. The baseline allows a global magnitude constant and a local matter-density term about flat Lambda CDM with Omega_m=0.3. With free constants for all 15 exact field labels, the three generalized dipole information fractions are 0.0006252, 0.0015615, and 0.0412780. Four free sky-region constants give 0.0014992, 0.0045675, and 0.1274713. Thus most baseline additive dipole information depends on constraints between fields. If each field-label shift lies between -0.010 and +0.010 mag, the maximum change in the baseline fitted dipole vector is 0.435414 mag. Cube enumeration and an independent convex-hull calculation agree. This is a chosen sensitivity scale, not a measured calibration error. Statistical-only, fixed-density, and redshift controls are reported. Independent SVD, joint-fit, precision-matrix, and direct-perturbation checks pass. The primary residual dipole has nominal Gaussian p=0.558; the free-field fit has p=0.282. These results do not establish physical anisotropy or assess scalar dark-energy constraints. We preserve code, input hashes, row matches, transformed data, response matrices, figures, and reproduction instructions.
We test whether a constant source velocity fitted at 0.015 ≤ zCMB < 0.04 improves predictions at 0.04 ≤ zCMB < 0.10 in the original Pantheon+ release. Here zCMB is the redshift in the cosmic microwave background frame. Each survey has a free magnitude constant in each shell. The fit uses 414 light curves from 322 events. The test uses 148 light curves from 135 other events, reduced to 134 survey contrasts. An exact Gaussian prediction keeps the supplied covariance between shells and uncertainty in the fitted parameters. The velocity model gains 2.40183 natural-log units over the model with survey constants alone. The fitted speed is 276.19 km/s. The joint no-flow reference has upper-tail probability 0.0002512 from numerical integration; 200,000 Gaussian draws give a consistent estimate. A post-result base predictive check holds the observed training data fixed and gives a tail fraction of 1.13% from one million draws. All eleven planned controls keep a positive score. Detection fractions for an injected 300 km/s flow range from 47.6% to 82.2% along three fixed axes. This is a retrospective prediction test with linear velocities and fixed Gaussian errors. It does not test cosmological isotropy or a complete cosmic velocity field. Later distance revisions are outside its scope. The package preserves code, derived arrays, source hashes, the unchanged plan, figures, and a fresh-run comparison.
We test expansion with no past acceleration using seven public DESI DR2 BAO distances. The test assumes FLRW geometry, a fixed common comoving ruler, and the released Gaussian point-distance model. It allows spatial curvature ΩK ≥ −25/9. A closed model then has curvature radius at least 0.6 c/H0; open curvature is unrestricted. We apply Sutherland's known BAO inequality as six linear contrasts. Each contrast uses the isotropic distance at redshift 0.295 and one higher radial distance. We retain their shared measurement error and compute the sharp worst-case Gaussian tail for the largest violation. The maximum is 2.8091 standard errors at redshift 0.934. Correction for all six radial bins gives p = 0.014211. A Bonferroni upper bound is 0.014906. The same construction gives a simultaneous 95% upper confidence limit of -0.01264 for the minimum deceleration parameter over 0 ≤ z ≤ 0.934. A separate 50-digit calculation and one million full-source Gaussian simulations support the calibration. The evidence is modest. Omitting the redshift 0.934 radial bin gives p = 0.647. Increasing all standard errors by about 19% removes rejection at the 5% level. The curvature bound is imposed, not measured. The exploratory result does not locate acceleration or measure it today. The contribution is a DR2 application and probability calibration, not a new physical inequality or the first BAO evidence for acceleration. The package preserves exact source data, provenance, code, proof, search records, results, figures, and reproduction instructions.
We test simultaneous residual covariance in two public releases of lensed-quasar light curves. A fixed rule forms groups of three epochs without overlap. Each adjacent gap is at most 2.5 days. A contrast removes a locally linear magnitude signal. We report all 27 image pairs from seven lenses, with 1,316 released epochs and 381 selected triples. In the 157-row 2017 WFI2033-4723 release, the A1–A2 residual correlation is −0.593 from 46 triples. A circular block bootstrap gives a 95% interval of [−0.727, −0.465]. Both time halves and all nine grouping checks give negative values. The raw magnitude-difference variance is 1.616 times the sum of the two marginal variances. With a common magnitude zero point, a descriptive flux check gives a summed-flux variance ratio of 0.231 and nearly equal, opposite flux changes. This is consistent with known flux sharing, but does not prove the cause. One of 21 external pairs passes a Holm-adjusted 0.05 test: 2M1134 A–C has positive correlation of 0.487. The contrasts can also contain fast source variation and calibration errors. The released WFI2033 rows do not identify the 136-epoch subset used in the source paper. The result applies to the public file and does not establish a change in time delays or cosmology. We provide code, source hashes, derived data, figures, simulations, and reproduction instructions.
We test how constant brightness shifts between surveys affect an additive sky dipole in Pantheon+. The primary sample has 1,365 non-calibrator observations at zHD > 0.0233. We use the full released covariance and fit a global magnitude constant and a local matter-density term. Free constants for all 20 survey IDs retain 67.49% to 93.38% of the baseline dipole Fisher information in every parameter direction. If each survey shift has absolute value at most 0.010 magnitude, the largest fitted dipole change is 0.0101276 magnitude. Exhaustive cube-vertex enumeration and an independent convex-hull calculation give the same bound. The primary residual dipole is consistent with zero under the tested Gaussian linear model, with nominal p = 0.515. A nonlinear density fit changes each dipole component by at most 0.0164 millimagnitude. Redshift and covariance controls are reported. The chosen shift bound is a sensitivity scale, not a measured calibration uncertainty. The result does not establish cosmic anisotropy and does not test velocity-model errors. We release response matrices, numerical witnesses, figures, code, input hashes, and reproduction instructions.
We test whether public DESI DR2 distances reject a flat expansion history that never accelerates. The test uses six transverse and radial distance pairs, linear contrasts, and the released Gaussian covariance. It requires no sound horizon calibration. We allow any positive, differentiable expansion rate in the point-distance model. The largest violation is 2.6725 standard errors at redshift 0.934. Correction for all six bins gives p = 0.02238. A bound that does not require independence between bins gives p = 0.02259. Test inversion gives a simultaneous 95% upper confidence limit of -0.01378 for the minimum deceleration parameter between redshift zero and 0.934. The evidence is modest. Omitting this pair gives p = 0.625 for the remaining five pairs. Increasing all standard errors by 12% removes rejection at the 5% level. Setting the negative within-bin covariance to zero would overstate the evidence. A radial-only control gives p = 0.493. We also give finite constraints for sampled flat histories with no acceleration and independently verify their numerical fit. The result assumes spatial flatness and Gaussian point distances at the effective redshifts. It does not locate acceleration in redshift or measure it today. The package preserves code, unchanged source data, provenance, results, figures, and reproduction instructions.
We test the error covariance of repeated supernova measurements in the original public Pantheon+ release at commit c447f0f. Differences within an event remove its true magnitude and any common cosmological prediction. We identify 1,533 events in 1,701 rows. The 168 independent contrast directions give chi-square 52.5771 with the full statistical and systematic covariance. The lower-tail probability is 3.04e-19 under a fixed Gaussian covariance and equal expected corrected magnitudes within each event. The statistical covariance alone also gives low scatter. An exact generalized least squares split separates repeat contrasts from event means. After the redshift and calibrator cuts, 122 repeat directions contain 47.4% of the reference chi-square shortfall in a two-parameter flat Lambda CDM fit. A covariance term shared perfectly within each event cancels from this repeat test. We provide contrast covariances, event means with a lossless fixed-covariance compression, figures, code, input hashes, and reproduction instructions. The result locates part of the known low-scatter problem. It does not identify its cause. Selection and the process that estimated the covariance are not included in the conditional reference probability. Later corrected data releases are outside the tested scope.