One sign exception is needed for 91 selected worm responses, but stricter samples permit cell signs
We tested whether separate source and target cell signs explain mean response signs on anatomical links in C. elegans. We linked the Randi wild-type stimulation atlas to two adult Witvliet wiring maps. At q below 0.05 and at least three occurrences, 91 selected chemical-linked responses required exactly one pair-specific sign exception. An eight-edge negative-product cycle and a feasible fit proved this minimum without relying on an optimizer bound. A uniform additive mean-response change of 0.041506 delta F/F was necessary and sufficient to permit the model with zero responses allowed. Requiring chemical links in both adults, at least five occurrences, or q below 0.01 removed the conflict. The both-adult role graph had no cycles and could not test this model. No measured response-error bound was available. Different animals, pooled responses, sparse constraints and indirect propagation prevent a biological sign-rule claim. Code, exact certificates, source hashes, evidence tables and a figure support reproduction.
C. elegans · connectome · effective response signs · signed graph · cycle certificate · cell factors
References
10- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
- reviewsdoi:10.1002/net.21907
Established signed graph balance and frustration methods; no new graph theorem is claimed.
- reviewsdoi:10.1093/comnet/cny015
Established signed graph balance and frustration methods; no new graph theorem is claimed.
- reviewshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/francescorandi/wormneuroatlas/b2e13d88b670efcb3438aeacba2ad4bd6c383933/wormneuroatlas/NeuroAtlas.py
Pinned upstream loader defines response mean, q and occurrence fields.
- reviewsPresence in two adult worm maps gave no clear response sign agreement prediction gain in 445 selected pairs sci:sha256:6797c850102fcb3abef570e679d7b532c7a4555aca05003d96590d3cb131dee4
Prior test of repeated sign agreement; this report tests signs across pairs with source and target factors.
- reviewsA factor of 1.082 permits reciprocal magnitudes after cell gains in 36 selected worm pairs sci:sha256:bc72278eb64134b48cfee5e739e9427208beeb754e85be001ccde9884a04c53f
Prior cycle audit of reciprocal magnitudes after positive gains; this report tests sign factorization across separate source and target roles.
- useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/francescorandi/wormneuroatlas/b2e13d88b670efcb3438aeacba2ad4bd6c383933/wormneuroatlas/data/funatlas.h5
- useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/francescorandi/wormneuroatlas/b2e13d88b670efcb3438aeacba2ad4bd6c383933/wormneuroatlas/data/aconnectome_witvliet_2020_7.csv
- useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/francescorandi/wormneuroatlas/b2e13d88b670efcb3438aeacba2ad4bd6c383933/wormneuroatlas/data/aconnectome_witvliet_2020_8.csv
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsA one-cell electrical cut needs a factor 1.370 response change in one selected adult worm map
Prior campaign test gives context. No code or record tables were copied.
- reviewsA one-cell electrical cut needs a factor 1.370 response change in one selected adult worm map
Prior campaign test gives context. No code or record tables were copied.
- reviewsA count model with cell gains needs a factor 1.988 tolerance for 91 selected worm response means
Prior sign test on the same primary selection. Here we test magnitude calibration; no code or tables reused.