Absolute 10–90 ms voltage scores had higher response label AUCs than negative scores for means of ten pulses in two SEEG recordings
We tested whether voltage sign changes agreement with expert response labels in public SEEG data. We used OpenNeuro ds004774 version 1.0.0. The fixed selection retained 630 pulses at 63 surface stimulation sites in two recordings. Twelve depth contacts gave 378 distinct means of ten pulses and 566 expert label cells. We compared fixed 10 to 90 ms voltage scores without a new filter or voltage reference. The primary target included response codes 1 and 2. The absolute score had a higher observed AUC than the negative score in all three recording and expert groups. The AUC gains were 0.353, 0.301, and 0.090. Whole-site resampling bounds included zero for the last gain. The code-1-only target reduced the SB gain to 0.011. The absolute control score before the pulse had bounds that included 0.5 in all groups. The package preserves native depth epochs, source labels, metadata, range hashes, selection records, code, three figures, and instructions. Independent score and AUC checks passed. This is a label ranking result in two clinical recordings. It does not establish a neural source, a population effect, or BCI performance.
SEEG · intracranial EEG · evoked responses · electrical stimulation · response labels · area under the curve · signal scoring · brain-computer interfaces
References
3- usesFive-pulse SEEG means had higher 20–100 ms shape similarity than before-pulse controls in three recordings with an odd–even split sci:sha256:6070351f0242e8b87bbcec400d56f9e92e15e2e6e2c1fabf38d81db2c9deb53b
We reused its pinned source metadata, expert-label audit, and MIT retrieval code. We extended the first-eight-site extracts to all 63 eligible sites in the two depth-label recordings. We added fixed sign scores, matched-expert tests, and label ranking results.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004774.v1.0.0
Source data, depth voltages, events, channel tables, and expert annotations from the exact analyzed OpenNeuro release (version 1.0.0).
- doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110389
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTen-pulse means had higher response label AUCs than first pulses for a fixed 10–90 ms absolute score in two SEEG recordings
This study uses the native SEEG epochs, expert labels, fixed complete-frame selection, source metadata, and raw range provenance from this publication. Its ten-pulse scores were reproduced exactly. New tests change the pulse budget and preserve pulse order.
- usesPulse variance correction gave AUC gains below 0.007 with intervals that included zero for the first five pulses in two SEEG recordings
Its source label audit informed the primary response target, which includes codes 1 and 2, and the secondary target for code 1. The present study tests new energy scores and preserves a separate audit of all finite depth annotation codes.
- usesRemoving self-products raised observed five-pulse expert label AUCs by less than 0.007 in two SEEG recordings
We used its source label audit and author-code reference to check the response codes.
- usesTen-pulse 10–90 ms SEEG score thresholds fitted at a 10% source error limit gave 4.3% and 12.6% target false response rates in two recordings
This work supplied the native 2048 Hz epochs inherited through the direct parent. We keep the same sites and contacts. We check all retained voltage values against a fresh retrieval of pinned raw ranges.