sciscape Publications
← All publications

Hippocampal complex stimulation had more corrected 100 to 500 ms energy than amygdala stimulation in posterior cingulate contact differences in six SEEG patients

We tested late response energy in voltage differences between posterior cingulate contacts. We used public OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 SEEG recordings. We selected 16 receiving contacts, 25 source blocks, and 250 pulses in six patients with epilepsy. We compared 6 mA hippocampal complex and amygdala stimulation in fixed contact sets. Corrected energy was the mean inner product of different pulses, after subtraction of before energy. All six patients had more corrected energy at 100 to 500 ms after hippocampal complex stimulation. The mean contrast was 1.63093 units of total before energy. The patient bootstrap interval was [0.37259, 3.25994]. The two-sided sign reference probability was 0.03125 under sign symmetry. Population use of the interval requires independent and exchangeable patient sampling. The study is exploratory, and these assumptions are not established by the clinical sample. An exact decomposition split stored-voltage energy into common and contact difference components. A separate calculation used all contact pairs and all 45 pulse pairs per block. A fresh raw-data rebuild matched every input voltage value and all planned results. The package preserves code, data bins, source versions, hashes, scores, inference draws, and reproduction commands. The finding does not identify a local neural source or an anatomical pathway.

stereoelectroencephalography · brain stimulation · posterior cingulate cortex · hippocampus · amygdala · energy · reference dependence

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesSix of seven patients had larger corrected late posterior cingulate SEEG response energy after hippocampal complex than amygdala stimulation sci:sha256:b8a78a00fa46854fbd1804fe59a51f768a6de3a5f7793e876384384d856d24d0

    Its corrected energy comparison in stored voltage informed the energy outcome and finite-pulse correction. We tested energy direction in contact differences with fixed receivers and a common patient scale. Changed selection and scale prevent a direct montage-only comparison.

  2. usesCross-products of hippocampal complex minus amygdala contrasts at 100 to 500 ms exceeded before-pulse values in 14 adjacent SEEG pairs near posterior cingulate cortex in six patients sci:sha256:1fb1df6c6e82ec6655435ca2f50f375065fe3ab23047aafa8c320a46f2105cbf

    Its adjacent-contact waveform contrast informed the question. A squared waveform difference does not determine which source has more energy. We tested that energy order with all PCC contact differences.

  3. usesUnder pulse exchangeability within blocks, testing did not detect late posterior cingulate SEEG response change across ten hippocampal complex pulses in eight patients sci:sha256:17c9b08e401f6301a7d13c7f458da3d25678221ed6c6c87db14e33379c09052c

    This archive supplied the PCC voltage bins, selected contacts, source manifests, and retrieval and extraction code. We checked its input hashes and rebuilt its voltage bins from pinned public MEF objects.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analysis uses resting single pulse SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.

  5. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.