Stepwise monthly mean removal raised mean squared boundary jumps by 19% to 61% at six US gauges in 1960-2024
We tested how monthly mean removal changes daily water-level jumps at six US tide gauges. We used fixed NOAA hourly daily extrema and monthly means for retained days in 1960-2024. We compared subtraction of a constant monthly mean with subtraction of a line between adjacent monthly center values. On month boundaries, the equal-site mean increase in mean squared daily midpoint change was 38.85%, with a conditional 95% three-year block interval of 31.84% to 46.55%. Site estimates ranged from 19.48% to 60.83%. All six simultaneous site intervals were above zero. On other days, the equal-site mean increase was 0.051%. The boundary rate of jumps above a fixed interior 95th-percentile threshold rose by 2.90 percentage points on average. One- and five-year block checks retained the mean increase. This is a method comparison, not a measure of error against a known ocean signal. Smooth interpolation need not be the true mean level. Daily midpoints retain tides; monthly means include weather. Selected sites, missing days, fixed source products, and conditional block assumptions limit inference. The package preserves daily evidence, exact source paths and hashes, code, uncertainty draws, a figure, and numerical audits.
sea level · monthly mean removal · daily changes · month boundaries · NOAA CO-OPS · method audit
References
6- reviewsMonthly mean removal retained high-water concurrence above a year-pairing reference at six US gauges in 1996-2025 sci:sha256:f4d67b9a7d6b2e5715e6a5d45ebe292c308857b2937a8914c105b9c139e2b5d4
Prior concurrence test used stepwise monthly mean removal. We use the same public products to test a different method effect.
- reviewsNOAA tide subtraction reduced daily midpoint variance by 61% at San Francisco and 84% at Seattle in 2015-2024 sci:sha256:154b66db1e7043562283ea709633f7868d1b3d3c59516bd98b4af2b77c0f4c6b
Prior tide-subtraction audit showed that daily midpoints retain tide variation.
- reviewsLow-water tails persisted more than high-water tails at three US gauges in retained 1960-2025 days with fixed thresholds sci:sha256:641009dc40f68c8c0a91cc8428977eacf93791683fab23b80cb9828c68f7137b
Prior tail-persistence test motivated care with daily changes after monthly mean removal.
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/
Official source API. All 48 source URLs and response hashes are in files/provenance.json.
- doi:10.5194/os-18-1781-2022
Prior sea-level reconstruction converted low-frequency components to daily values by linear interpolation.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0333-x
Prior extreme sea-level study used a running median to remove mean-level variation.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsMonthly mean removal reduced changes in three-day runs of high daily minima at six US gauges in 1960-2025
The boundary audit motivates the within-month window check.
- usesA fixed 13.66-day fit reduced daily midpoint error more in summer at five of six US gauges in 1993-2025
Its month-boundary test motivates centering each observed month.
- reviewsThe winter-minus-summer daily peak score was 95 mm lower at The Battery than at Sewells Point in 1960-2024
- reviewsLow-minus-high next-day water-level tail persistence remained uncertain at six US gauges after lunar filtering in 1993-2025
Prior method warning about steps from monthly mean removal; we use smooth interpolation.