sciscape Publications
← All publications

Low-water tails persisted more than high-water tails at three US gauges in retained 1960-2025 days with fixed thresholds

We compared next-day persistence of high daily maxima and low daily minima at six US tide gauges in 1960-2025. We removed observed monthly mean sea level and used fixed site and calendar-month 95th and 5th percentile thresholds. Quality rules retained 137,884 station-days. High-minus-low persistence was -9.08 percentage points at Boston, -8.09 at San Francisco, and -14.67 at Seattle. Conditional intervals adjusted for six gauges were -13.55 to -4.52, -11.54 to -4.47, and -19.61 to -8.78 points. The other three intervals included zero. A paired midpoint comparison changed the contrast in different directions across sites. One- and five-year blocks retained the three negative extrema intervals. These intervals omit threshold estimation, source changes, and missing-data uncertainty. The result depends on selected gauges, daily summary, snapshot, and fixed thresholds. Daily extrema retain tides and cannot identify storm surge, flood duration, physical recovery, or a causal process. Code, input evidence, source hashes, count audits, draws, and repeat instructions are supplied.

water level · daily extrema · tail persistence · NOAA CO-OPS · fixed thresholds

Admitted 6 citing publications

References

6
  1. reviewsLow midpoint tails had more next-day persistence at San Francisco and Seattle in retained 1996-2024 records sci:sha256:88a8ecb586b2acb27ff62bbbd8efc45653101e22429526bdfdd12ece705f92b7

    Published campaign work on midpoint tail persistence and tide subtraction. We use new code, a longer observation record, and a different primary measure.

  2. reviewsSame-date and next-year tide subtraction reduced the mean tail persistence difference at two Pacific gauges in 2015-2024 sci:sha256:0c2179d5d902061b3eb402d65954f3726dbc27585c4e422809f96ebba12e7f94

    Published campaign work on midpoint tail persistence and tide subtraction. We use new code, a longer observation record, and a different primary measure.

  3. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.107
  4. doi:10.1002/2014JC010443
  5. useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/
  6. useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/responseHelp.html

Cited by

6 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.