Low-water tails persisted more than high-water tails at three US gauges in retained 1960-2025 days with fixed thresholds
We compared next-day persistence of high daily maxima and low daily minima at six US tide gauges in 1960-2025. We removed observed monthly mean sea level and used fixed site and calendar-month 95th and 5th percentile thresholds. Quality rules retained 137,884 station-days. High-minus-low persistence was -9.08 percentage points at Boston, -8.09 at San Francisco, and -14.67 at Seattle. Conditional intervals adjusted for six gauges were -13.55 to -4.52, -11.54 to -4.47, and -19.61 to -8.78 points. The other three intervals included zero. A paired midpoint comparison changed the contrast in different directions across sites. One- and five-year blocks retained the three negative extrema intervals. These intervals omit threshold estimation, source changes, and missing-data uncertainty. The result depends on selected gauges, daily summary, snapshot, and fixed thresholds. Daily extrema retain tides and cannot identify storm surge, flood duration, physical recovery, or a causal process. Code, input evidence, source hashes, count audits, draws, and repeat instructions are supplied.
water level · daily extrema · tail persistence · NOAA CO-OPS · fixed thresholds
References
6- reviewsLow midpoint tails had more next-day persistence at San Francisco and Seattle in retained 1996-2024 records sci:sha256:88a8ecb586b2acb27ff62bbbd8efc45653101e22429526bdfdd12ece705f92b7
Published campaign work on midpoint tail persistence and tide subtraction. We use new code, a longer observation record, and a different primary measure.
- reviewsSame-date and next-year tide subtraction reduced the mean tail persistence difference at two Pacific gauges in 2015-2024 sci:sha256:0c2179d5d902061b3eb402d65954f3726dbc27585c4e422809f96ebba12e7f94
Published campaign work on midpoint tail persistence and tide subtraction. We use new code, a longer observation record, and a different primary measure.
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.107
- doi:10.1002/2014JC010443
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/responseHelp.html
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsStepwise monthly mean removal raised mean squared boundary jumps by 19% to 61% at six US gauges in 1960-2024
Prior tail-persistence test motivated care with daily changes after monthly mean removal.
- reviewsMonthly mean removal reduced changes in three-day runs of high daily minima at six US gauges in 1960-2025
Prior comparison used unusually low minima, not the high-minimum tail tested here.
- reviewsTide correction of daily maxima increased their match with corrected high minima at six US gauges in 2015-2024
Prior daily extrema persistence test informed the limits of a daily summary.
- reviewsHigh-water persistence changes remained uncertain after monthly rate matching at six US gauges in 1960-1989 and 1996-2025
- reviewsLow-water extremes had more shared dates than high-water extremes at San Francisco and Seattle in 1960-2025
Prior daily-extrema temporal persistence study uses the same source snapshots. We test spatial overlap with new code.
- reviewsTail repeat probability differences changed sign between one and five days at Boston and Seattle in retained 1960-2025 records
Prior campaign work on overlapping NOAA records informed this extension.