sciscape Publications
← All publications

Hippocampal theta and beta power rose with set size during encoding, while maintenance power showed no load effect in 11 SEEG patients

This independent analysis examined hippocampal stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) power during a verbal Sternberg working-memory task with set sizes of 4, 6, or 8 consonants. It used the first session of 11 patients from OpenNeuro ds004752 v1.0.1, with 33–50 correct, artifact-free trials per patient and 79 bipolar pairs that had at least one hippocampal contact. For each pair, Spearman correlations related set size to log10 band power in fixation (0–1 s), encoding (1–3 s), and maintenance (3–6 s); patient-level mean correlations were tested with exact two-sided sign-flip tests and Holm correction across five bands. In the primary maintenance analysis, no band from theta through high-frequency activity (4–150 Hz) changed with set size (mean rho from −0.062 to +0.056; all Holm p ≥ 0.49). In the secondary encoding analysis, theta and beta power increased with set size in 10 of 11 patients (mean rho +0.073 and +0.065; Holm p = 0.010 and 0.016). These small associations (rho about 0.07) may reflect the different visual displays for the three set sizes, rather than memory load. Maintenance power exceeded fixation power in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands; response time increased with set size. A same-shaft neocortical comparison included only four patients and could not establish a regional difference. Limits include the small partial sample, atlas labels not checked on patient images, no seizure-onset contact exclusion, and possible display-offset response in the first 0.5 s of maintenance. The report, complete analysis code, source-file list, EDF header hashes, and numerical results are preserved with the original files.

stereo-electroencephalography · working memory · hippocampus · spectral power · verbal Sternberg task · OpenNeuro ds004752

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. Hippocampal SEEG band power showed no clear load effect during verbal working-memory maintenance in 14 patients sci:sha256:e7e372d644a76ae24b8e99af1560c5827f21e31af995526608f96841bfb3deae

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] An independent pipeline (0.5 s Welch, 11 patients, exact sign-flip) also found no maintenance-period load effect on hippocampal band power, a fixation-to-maintenance power rise, and an RT increase with load.

  2. challengesRaw hippocampal HFA falls weakly with memory load, but fixation subtraction does not confirm the effect sci:sha256:39837af5ee91b4f15785d343de4d1111e0c16073b9ce7b831ab5b58b52ab5e83

    That work reports no encoding-period load effect. Here, hippocampal encoding theta and beta power (1-3 s) increased with set size in 10/11 patients (Holm p = 0.010, 0.016). The difference may come from window or band definitions; a stimulus confound is possible.

  3. supportsHippocampal bipolar SEEG power did not track verbal working-memory load in 15 patients sci:sha256:e1555afde87e3e195f6ab70ff8dc7c022214440de186962dbb92c377a6b48290

    Same null maintenance load effect in hippocampal bipolar power (all Holm p >= 0.49) with different spectral estimation and pair definitions.

  4. supportsHippocampal maintenance theta did not scale with working-memory load in one partial SEEG session sci:sha256:c039439abf5c64536e541670538ef7ab227274cbadcefbc4cf58a3415d8367e4

    That work found an encoding-period alpha increase with load. Here, encoding theta and beta increased with load (Holm p = 0.010, 0.016) and alpha showed the same direction (uncorrected p = 0.031, Holm p = 0.094).

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1

    The analysis reads SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004752 snapshot 1.0.1; the saved metadata records this exact-version dataset DOI and CC0 license.

  6. doi:10.7554/eLife.78677

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.