In 11 mice, spine pairs in visual cortex gave no clear extra eye-response agreement at 2–5 versus 10–20 µm after total-response control
We tested whether nearby synaptic inputs on a dendrite share relative responses to the two eyes. We used the released Jenks et al. visual-cortex data. We made a checked extract of 4,004 spine records in 13 neurons from 11 mice. We recovered fractional fluorescence units from the stored raw and corrected traces. All 8,008 eye-trace fits had maximum error below 4.8e-13 z-score units. The main test used 3,969 records in 238 fields. It compared path distances from 2 to less than 5 micrometres with 10 to less than 20 micrometres in the same field. Each pair score used different repeat halves. We removed a linear relation between eye contrast and total response. Mice had equal weight. The near minus far covariance score was 0.0282, with a 95% whole-mouse bootstrap interval from -0.0013 to 0.0677. A test with 9,999 response-label assignments within fields gave two-sided p=0.0824. The main test did not establish a local advantage. Some fixed controls gave stronger estimates. Removing source trials marked as possible back-propagating action potentials reduced the estimate to 0.0127, with an interval from -0.0154 to 0.0502. An exploratory scale audit changed the sign of 11.3% of source peak eye indices, mostly near weak eye bias. These are results for processed calcium signals. They do not identify presynaptic cells or prove a cause of local organization. The package contains compact data, figures, code, source hashes, plans and offline reproduction instructions. All eight validation checks passed. Two full analysis runs gave identical result values.
dendritic spines · ocular dominance · structure and function · calcium imaging · trial noise · data reuse
References
7- usesdoi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115861
We reanalyze the released spine recordings and anatomical distances.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.19372968
We use data version 1.0 and preserve source file hashes and original spine indices.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.18552068
We read code V1.0 to check eye order, raw ROI order, trial masks and source scaling.
- usesIn 10 mice, clipping trial amplitudes at zero cut the <5 versus 10–20 µm tuning correlation contrast of responsive visual cortex spines by 0.085 in tests with odd and even repeats sci:sha256:fe21349f81db26fc0fed7410847f79826d047b45849490025a94aafa867af7e2
We follow its checked method to rebuild signed trial amplitudes and check source path distances. Our test uses separate eye recordings and adds recovery of the fluorescence scale.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.005
Prior work links callosal input identity and local visual tuning on dendrites.
- doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60825-y
Prior work tracks eye-specific spine responses and local activity during development.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.023
Prior work links binocular synaptic input properties to aligned visual responses in ferret cortex.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- In 11 mice, patterns of shared calcium variation between spines repeated across eye conditions after linear controls
This prior monocular analysis tested mean relative eye responses in the same source dataset. The present analysis tests shared trial variation.
- usesEqual averages of nearby spines gave no clear extra agreement between orientation signals from the two eyes in 11 mice
We reuse its verified compact monocular arrays, fractional scale recovery, provenance, and MIT source extraction tools.