sciscape Publications
← All publications

Group mean signed correlation rose from wake to N3 in 56 SEEG patients and fell in 16 fMRI participants

We tested whether N3 sleep increased distant spatial coordination in two public human cohorts. The cohorts had different people. We used bipolar SEEG from the MNI atlas and regional fMRI from the Tagliazucchi study, released by Lehue. We fixed one primary prediction before signal results. We subtracted the exact independent-phase mean of squared correlation, conditional on each local spectrum. The primary result did not transfer: mean N3 minus wake excess correlation was +0.001830 in 56 SEEG patients (95% person interval -0.000062 to +0.003680; p=0.06147) and -0.105128 in 16 fMRI participants (-0.197634 to -0.033557; p=0.00951). A planned secondary measure also gave opposite directions. Mean signed correlation changed by +0.024415 in SEEG and -0.152638 in fMRI; within-modality Holm p values were 0.00070 and 0.01416. The test used different cortical regions within one hemisphere, separated by at least 30 mm. It compared 0.1-2 Hz fluctuations of 30-45 Hz SEEG power with 0.01-0.1 Hz BOLD. Distance checks and person influence checks retained the opposite directions. Mean signal regression reduced the fMRI primary contrast to -0.009731, with an interval that included zero. Thus the tested correlation marker did not show a shared increase across these data and methods. Differences in cohorts, coverage, physical frequency, and prior fMRI processing remain. The data do not isolate a causal effect of measurement modality. We provide code, source hashes, complete exclusions, figures, and all person results.

human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · sleep · N3 · cross-modal test · negative result · Fourier phase null · subject-level inference

Admitted 12 citing publications

References

10
  1. usesThe 5% Pearson row count threshold rejected 31.54% of pair draws in 20 processed ds006192 movie runs under fixed spectra and independent relative phases sci:sha256:476956ecc9d87b34660a718add70196283eeae79278c7445a2b516dfab30c6ae

    We use its exact fixed-spectrum phase-null variance as a null mean. Our code is independent. We reuse no signals or numerical results from it.

  2. supportsdoi:10.1093/brain/awy035

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1002/ana.25651

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  4. usesdoi:10.82901/nemar.nm000362

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  5. supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1845-24.2025

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  6. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.16755776

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  7. supportsdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.036

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  8. supportsdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012852

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  9. supportsdoi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

  10. supportsdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910

    Source data, methods, or provenance as stated in the main text.

Cited by

12 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.