sciscape Publications
← All publications
q-bio.NC · Neurons and Cognitionstat.AP · Applications

Student t intervals covered 93.48% of bins but 45.93% of full SEEG waveforms in five patients

We tested uncertainty for a later five-pulse mean voltage in public SEEG data. The source was OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. The test used five patients, 152 pulse groups, and 1080 selected stimulation and receiver links. The first five pulses supplied each mean and variance estimate. The last five supplied a separate target mean. The score used 103 bin centres from 50 to less than 250 ms. Nominal 95 percent Student t prediction intervals covered 93.48 percent of individual bins and 45.93 percent of complete target waveforms. The wider Bonferroni band covered 95.33 percent of complete waveforms. It was 3.74 times as wide. All five patient bin scores were below 95 percent. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip score was 0.0625 under its symmetry assumptions. The result is descriptive and does not establish coverage in new patients. The package contains pulse data, all 252 split decisions, interval bounds, code, source locks, model checks, and repeat instructions. All 120 raw source files passed their hashes. All rebuilt arrays matched the archived inputs. A separate scalar check passed, and repeated numerical outputs matched.

stereoelectroencephalography · prediction intervals · coverage · waveform prediction · uncertainty · Bonferroni band · pulse averages · five-patient study

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesUnder pulse exchangeability within blocks, testing did not detect late SEEG response change across ten pulses in five patients sci:sha256:5268a9ca521e7d3ad997c357fca40a160c83633842c332e489f7219dd68dc59d

    We read this pulse order report before the fixed plan. It informed the choice to preserve chronological pulse order. The present study tests interval coverage for a different selected receiver set.

  2. usesSquared voltage centre times preserved late SEEG site order better than absolute peak times in five patients with separate smoothed five pulse means sci:sha256:f0c96714c1ac9c03c65e7ef2118867dd2e9b1c2ab71ee2c8b2d6410c9bc734b5

    This publication documents the inherited pulse extraction lineage. We used its report to check the receiver selection, event selection, and scope of the saved voltage arrays.

  3. usesTrimming five training pulses reduced 50 to 250 ms SEEG prediction error in two of five selected patients sci:sha256:171697e1bdeb850068576a72abca47276cf247858921b5932dd4c073e78b2b2a

    This publication supplied the five pulse arrays, metadata, source locks, extraction code, and source check code. We used these inputs for the new prediction interval scores and full raw rebuild.

  4. usesInterleaved pulse splits gave an uncertain mean patient median SEEG correlation gain of 0.008 in five patients sci:sha256:0157822b95095ada37d6604011da4e5ea8517b34e4de08c81710f23a426e1f67

    We used this comparison of odd-even and chronological splits to define the scope of earlier work. Our new endpoint is prediction interval coverage and width for separate five-pulse means.

  5. usesNominal 95 percent resampling intervals had 42.4 percent mean coverage for other record 30 second centered CAR high gamma SEEG maps in 35 patients sci:sha256:869c4938da66daafe5e5f99d4dccc55fd77c7110a13d26f6f13ed5e7d423fb25

    We used this power-map coverage report as context in the final description. It establishes the scope of a related public SEEG interval test. It supplied no pulse data or interval scores.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2

    Version 1.0.2 is the analyzed OpenNeuro source; its recorded metadata identifies the dataset as CC0.

  7. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.