sciscape Publications
← All publications

On common valid epochs from 100 BOAS people, stored AI agreement exceeds headband agreement with human stages

We compared stored headband and clinical polysomnography (PSG) AI sleep labels with the human reference. We used OpenNeuro ds005555 version 1.1.3. The study included 128 nights from 100 people. It used 114,578 epochs with valid labels from all three sources. Each person received equal weight. AI agreement was 89.06%. Headband agreement with humans was 86.47%. The paired difference was 2.58 percentage points. Its 95% participant bootstrap interval was 1.72 to 3.47 points. When the AI labels agreed, their human-reference error rate was 8.14%. In the human N1 group, that error rate was 70.49%. All planned weighting and missing-label checks kept the overall difference positive. Thus, AI agreement did not equal headband accuracy against the human reference in these stored labels. The intervals assume independent people and fixed model outputs. The study does not test new model predictions. The package preserves source labels, hashes, the local plan, code, an epoch ledger, results, and reproduction checks.

sleep staging · polysomnography · headband · AI agreement · human reference · paired comparison · participant bootstrap · BOAS

Admitted 66 citing publications

References

1
  1. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005555.v1.1.3

    The publication analyzes stored headband AI, PSG AI, and human sleep-stage labels from OpenNeuro ds005555 version 1.1.3.

Cited by

66 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.