sciscape Publications
← All publications

At 500 nM, high-degree half connection concentration was below a matched receptor profile range in the 2024 C. elegans short-range peptide map

We tested whether a dense high-degree core in an inferred peptide map exceeds a reference that keeps complete receptor profiles. We used the February 2024 C. elegans map, expression threshold 4, 302 neuron labels, 127 expression groups and 92 molecular gene matches at 500 nM. The main graph excluded equal endpoints and pairs within one expression group. It had 30,824 edges. The reference exchanged whole receptor profiles only between groups with equal receptor counts and equal neuron copy counts. Peptide profiles, molecular matches and anatomy stayed fixed. Each graph selected its own 151-neuron core, with exact averaging at degree ties. Core density divided by whole-map density was 2.0431. In 20,000 independent assignments, the reference mean was 2.1031 and its central 95 percent range was 2.0585–2.1513. The recorded ratio was 2.85 percent below that mean. The two-sided reference tail value was 0.00580. Absolute core density stayed inside its reference range. The ratio was also below its range when within-group pairs were kept or broad cell type was matched. It was inside the range at 100 nM and in mid- and long-range checks. Thus this result depends on the setting. All 80,000 sampled core scores passed a second calculation. A clean process reproduced all numerical records. The package preserves source files, provenance, code, assignments, per-neuron results and figures. This reference changes neuron degrees and does not repeat a fixed-degree rich-club test. The results describe potential interactions in one map, not measured signaling or differences between animals.

connectome · Caenorhabditis elegans · neuropeptide · receptor expression · high-degree core · conditional permutation · rich club · reproducible research

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.043

    We analyze the released peptide map and compare our conditional core question with the source rich-club result.

  2. usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6895870.v1

    Source collection and attribution. The exact later February 2024 input bytes are pinned by Git commit and hashes in our package.

  3. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.023

    Underlying CeNGEN expression measurements enter through the released peptide map.

  4. usesdoi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113058

    Underlying peptide and receptor assay matches enter through the released map.

  5. usesAt a 500 nM cutoff, the two-way edge fraction between expression groups was within a matched receptor profile range in the 2024 C. elegans short-range peptide map sci:sha256:21d9adfe4ded7954d354c0b56b8b382e0eb7b2d86b3f854178cd5cfd09d9e272

    We reuse prepared arrays, source grouping, the copy-count matched whole receptor profile reference, and the attributed preparation code. We test core concentration instead of two-way edge fraction.

  6. usesAt fixed gene partner counts, changing most pairs kept neuron degree ranks similar in the 2024 short-range C. elegans peptide map sci:sha256:ad48c7fa79305861e670b50997a255aa8e7fe74149ae6dcebbeb3acfae360218

    We use its high-degree-half density statistic and exact tie treatment. Its preparation code is reused through the later study. We change receptor profile assignment while keeping molecular matches fixed.

  7. usesOne gene loss removes all listed support for 5,407 multichannel connections in the 2024 short-range C. elegans peptide model sci:sha256:ca108f7e42c2e47e88eeb5d6ad7b4aaa0d7a256d19e214b2bc1d3ef954ae4367

    Its versioned shared source cache supplied the original map files. We verified all selected hashes and three fresh upstream files.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.