At fixed gene partner counts, changing most pairs kept neuron degree ranks similar in the 2024 short-range C. elegans peptide map
We tested how exact peptide and receptor gene pairs affect the order of highly connected neurons. We used the February 2024 C. elegans peptide map: 302 neuron labels, 49 peptide genes, 51 receptor genes, and 92 pairs at 500 nM. Every altered map kept each gene's partner count, all expression profiles, and all spatial limits fixed. In 8,000 altered maps, an average of 84.6% of molecular pairs changed. The short-range neuron degree ranks had mean Spearman correlation 0.939 with the source map (central reference range 0.904–0.965). Expected overlap with the original top 25 was 88.0%; overlap with the top six was 52.7%. Uniform tie selection was included in these scores. Density within the high-degree half was 0.698 in the source and had a reference mean of 0.695 (range 0.653–0.758). Within-family changes and a 100 nM cutoff gave the same broad pattern. The full long-range rank correlation was 0.852, and ranks within its original top quarter were much less stable. Independent sampling and arithmetic checks passed. These results separate stable overall degree order from more sensitive leading-neuron selection in this fixed model. The altered molecular matches are controls, not measured binding pairs. The ranges do not describe variation between worms. The package preserves all source inputs, hashes, 18,000 altered molecular graphs, scores, code, figures, and repeat instructions.
connectome · Caenorhabditis elegans · neuropeptide · gene expression · network hubs · null model · molecular specificity · reproducibility
References
8- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.043
Source map, hub analysis, and rich-club reference.
- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6895870.v1
Source data collection; exact analyzed bytes are pinned by Git commit and hashes.
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.023
Underlying CeNGEN expression data.
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113058
Underlying peptide-receptor interaction screen.
- usesPredicted self-signaling pair counts fell within matched receptor profile ranges in 127 C. elegans expression groups sci:sha256:70c513a1b25c8f973e923136e6aae7e5ea6deff017b8baaf05011f76e608ea52
Its source-data checks guided independent reconstruction and the 127-profile control. No analysis code was copied.
- usesOne gene loss removes all listed support for 5,407 multichannel connections in the 2024 short-range C. elegans peptide model sci:sha256:ca108f7e42c2e47e88eeb5d6ad7b4aaa0d7a256d19e214b2bc1d3ef954ae4367
We used the versioned source cache established for its analysis of the same 92 channel layers.
- usesdoi:10.1038/ncomms5114
Curveball reference sampler.
- supportsdoi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042812
Uniform stationary law of the Curveball sampler.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAt a 500 nM cutoff, the two-way edge fraction between expression groups was within a matched receptor profile range in the 2024 C. elegans short-range peptide map
We reuse its MIT source preparation script. It tests molecular partner changes and hub ranks, while this work tests receptor assignment and reciprocal edges.
- usesPeptide pair counts raised ridge test error by 0.20% for WT and unc-31 response differences in 1,342 C. elegans atlas pairs
We reuse 200 fixed-margin molecular graphs to test added prediction value for measured function.
- usesAt 500 nM, high-degree half connection concentration was below a matched receptor profile range in the 2024 C. elegans short-range peptide map
We use its high-degree-half density statistic and exact tie treatment. Its preparation code is reused through the later study. We change receptor profile assignment while keeping molecular matches fixed.