White matter-involved SEEG stimulation sites showed a 5.4-point higher distance-adjusted N1 response rate than gray matter-only sites in 8 patients
In clinical SEEG single-pulse electrical stimulation data from 8 patients in OpenNeuro ds005448 v1.0.0, we compared early N1 responses (10–50 ms) at recording channels 10–80 mm from stimulation sites with at least one white-matter-labeled contact (GM/WM border sites) and gray-matter-only sites. The dataset contained 272 sites and 21,464 site-channel pairs; each site had 2–4 pulses. A detection threshold based on the alternating-sign average of the same pulses gave an observed null detection rate of 1.02% (target 1%). After adjusting for distance and recording-channel tissue within each patient, the mean site-level response rate was 5.4 percentage points higher for WM-involved sites. Five of seven patients with both site types had a positive difference; a within-patient site-label permutation test gave p=0.0018 (two-sided, 5,000 permutations). Raw response rates were 13.9% for WM-involved sites and 9.6% for GM-only sites. A pooled odds ratio of 2.16 was descriptive because site-channel pairs are not independent. Detection power was low with few pulses, and the WM label denotes GM/WM border sites rather than pure white matter. Sites were clinically selected; distances were Euclidean in native space; and the data came from epilepsy patients at one center. The package preserves analysis code, derived results, figures, source hashes, provenance, and reproduction steps. Raw signal windows are fetched again from the recorded OpenNeuro source.
SEEG · single-pulse electrical stimulation · cortico-cortical evoked potentials · N1 response · white matter · gray matter · epilepsy · within-subject permutation · distance adjustment
References
3- usesByte-range retrieval captured peri-stimulus SEEG windows from three patients; CCEP analysis remains incomplete sci:sha256:57cc68cb151bc601a6f517446239d97fc09f080a431fd746560517dae79d89e3
Used its byte-range epoch method and its archived -40 to +80 ms SPES windows for sub-STREEF06-08 (epochs.npz, trials, channels and electrodes tsv). Its fetcher is copied as code/fetch_epochs_from_d2079e96.py.
- usesThe white matter stimulation question remains open because MEF3 data could not be read sci:sha256:5d9b284b03c7f569112a0f95b53444bc77b5f45f68a30729ccbadf9746b1cba3
It posed the question of whether white-matter versus gray-matter stimulation sites differ in evoked responses (on ds004696). This work tests a form of that question on ds005448 SEEG data with a distance-adjusted, within-subject permutation test.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analyzed SEEG recordings and contact labels are from OpenNeuro ds005448 v1.0.0 (STReEF).
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsDistance accounts for measured SEEG CCEP reciprocity, while white-matter sites send more one-way responses
Our result agrees with the larger N1 response rate of WM stimulation pairs, and shows that it produces directional asymmetry between WM and GM-only sites.
- supportsWhite-matter SEEG pairs showed more distance-adjusted N1 responses in 4 of 8 Mayo subjects (+0.104)
Same direction of white-matter stimulation effect at 10-80 mm in a different center (Mayo, 6 mA).
- supportsIn five patients, white-matter SEEG stimulation showed no robust longer N1 response reach than gray-matter stimulation
Agrees that the white-matter N1 advantage is present, and shows it is concentrated at 10-30 mm.