At selected auditory sites, the top quarter by voice preference retained tuning in a source nonvocal panel in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We tested whether sites with strong voice preference keep reliable response differences among source nonvocal sounds. Separate public human studies supplied SEEG high-gamma amplitude and fMRI BOLD estimates. One repeat selected the top quarter of auditory sites by voice AUC. Two other repeats measured nonvocal sound rank reliability. Development used two patients and four adults. A local plan and code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. Mean retained reliability was 0.3715, 0.4593 and 0.3124. Pointwise 95% person intervals were [0.2930,0.4500], [0.4209,0.4976] and [0.2733,0.3515]. All 30 people had positive scores. The shared rule passed, with Holm p=0.046875 for three claims. The initial negative-association prediction failed. A positive direction fixed after development also failed, with Holm p=0.21875; one SEEG patient was negative. Controls retained nonvocal tuning after uniform spatial response removal and disjoint sound calibration. A small positive preonset score and discordant association controls remain. An exact normal model shows that unequal site noise can make observed preference and reliability rise together despite fixed latent preference. Thus the test does not identify a latent specialization tradeoff. Separate cohorts, source site screens, clinical sampling, broad sound labels and common schedules limit scope. We do not establish shared neurons or causality. The package preserves code, source pins and terms, local plans, all results, uncertainty draws, figures and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external.
auditory cortex · voice preference · nonvocal tuning · SEEG · fMRI · rank reliability · measurement precision · independent repeats
References
11- usesAt selected sites, four nonvocal axes captured extra speech-and-song repeat energy in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:660b18f6d8c528c13cb89491f53a58e0cc5ade368023e431c8a672676548c6a5
We reuse its MIT source preparation code, exact author file pins and documented sound class rule. We test a different site preference and nonvocal reliability endpoint.
- usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
Public source study or source archive for the reused neural measurements and preparation.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
Public source study or source archive for the reused neural measurements and preparation.
- usesdoi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
Public source study or source archive for the reused neural measurements and preparation.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
Public source study or source archive for the reused neural measurements and preparation.
- usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
Public source study or source archive for the reused neural measurements and preparation.
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
Author code archive cited as source context; the neural author archive is pinned separately by SHA-256.
- doi:10.1038/35002078
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1388-12.2012
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063
- doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501481
Cited by
7 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesExploratory vocal subgroup terms were positive for fixed sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults; shared tests failed
Motivates the relative spread question. Its nonvocal rank and site association endpoints differ from ours.
- usesAt selected auditory sites, a voice contrast kept repeatable nonvocal sound differences in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Motivated a different test of nonvocal tuning along a class direction fitted on other sounds, rather than at selected individual sites.
- usesResidual covariance at eight selected sites per person failed a shared test in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Its retained nonvoice tuning result motivates the stronger residual covariance question at speech/song-preferring sites.
- Speech/song reading stayed above chance in the weakest fitting half of selected sites in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
Its preference and nonvocal tuning test is related prior work; this analysis tests weak-preference class reading.
- Two fixed voice detail tests failed their shared rule in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Prior site preference and nonvocal tuning test informed question choice. The present held-out nonspeech voice detail interaction is a different endpoint.
- Removing the half of selected sites with the highest fitting reliability decreased sound assignment accuracy more than random removal in six SEEG patients and two fMRI panels
Prior selected-site tuning test; it differs from reliability-ranked removal.
- usesAt selected sites, sound groups concentrated repeat covariance in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults; a within-group majority test failed
The selected-site tuning result and its broad-label limit motivated this variance-budget question.