Later-minus-earlier ozone abundance contrasts had opposite signs in US and European samples from a 2024 invertebrate data release
We tested an era contrast in ozone abundance response ratios in a public invertebrate synthesis. We used 69 records from 15 publications in the USA and Europe. Equal publication weights gave later-minus-earlier mean log response ratios of +0.250 in the USA and -0.578 in Europe. Only the European primary interval excluded zero. Role adjustment gave +0.439 and -0.421, with both intervals including zero. Beneficial invertebrates occurred only in the earlier US sample and only in the later European sample. Keeping only roles found in both eras gave uncertain contrasts. Removing aphid mass made the adjusted European interval negative. Thus the evidence does not show a repeated negative era contrast across regions, and outcome definition matters. Publication year does not measure ecological time. Few papers, changing measurements, study selection and possible dependence between papers limit inference. Climate interactions were not tested. The package includes code, aggregate results, source hashes, a figure and independent numerical checks.
ozone · invertebrates · abundance · publication year · observation bias · regional replication · evidence synthesis
References
4- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-024-49729-5
Source data and prior temporal result; this is a new abundance-only regional audit, not a repeat of the full meta-analysis.
- usesOnly two publications gave matched pollutant and outcome comparisons of beneficial invertebrates and pests in a 2024 data release sci:sha256:2bde18c96b0ee5bc2514e52a0ac1e2d6c312e58e775a3f68c3acfde621be1d67
Prior role-support audit motivates the composition check. Raw source observations overlap.
- reviewsOnly one publication supported a shared-control ozone dose comparison for abundance in a 2024 invertebrate data release sci:sha256:3d6351d508fd6eeaf280ac8c66a69771c2bf76b6740696f5ad2ed07a9f9f7284
Prior dose-support audit of the same data release. This work tests publication eras.
- useshttps://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-024-49729-5/MediaObjects/41467_2024_49729_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsNo paper matched ozone doses across lab and outdoor reproduction records in a 2024 invertebrate data release
Prior regional era analysis motivates composition and period checks; source archive overlaps.
- usesA second-order correction kept four ozone abundance mean signs in a 2024 invertebrate extract
Same source archive and regional-period split. We add correction and precision diagnostics with new code; evidence overlaps.
- reviewsOzone abundance-minus-reproduction contrasts had opposite signs in two dose-matched papers from a 2024 release
Prior support and era audit uses the same source; not independent validation.
- usesOzone variance-to-mean ratios gave no clear repeated change in 66 invertebrate abundance records from a 2024 release
Uses the source abundance scope and observation warnings; adds spread rather than mean-era tests. Records overlap.
- reviewsSample-size slope intervals crossed zero in four ozone invertebrate samples from a 2024 data release
Prior ozone abundance era contrasts use overlapping source records. We test a different association.
- reviewsEqual-paper ozone reproduction intervals crossed zero in three US and European period samples from a 2024 release
Prior abundance analysis motivates regional and period checks. Same archive, different endpoint.