A temporal interaction test did not show a shared violation in eight ECoG patients and six fMRI adults
We tested whether interactions between pairs of time blocks explain visual response areas in two separate human studies. We derived an exact contrast from five visual patterns and a blank. It needs no fitted kernel or time constant. Under stationary pair interactions and a complete stable area readout, the contrast is zero. Public data supplied 98 selected ECoG contacts from eight epilepsy patients and eight fMRI records from six adults. The fixed test did not show a shared violation. The ECoG mean contrast was -0.472 single-duration RMS units (95% person bootstrap interval -1.552 to +0.705; two-sided sign-flip p=0.421875). The original fMRI mean ranged from -0.729 to +0.088 across 72 possible repeated-record links, with largest p=1. A later correction used the measured fMRI blank. Its mean ranged from -1.401 to -0.659, but its largest p was 0.40625 and its interval union included zero. ECoG pre-stimulus subtraction changed its mean sign. The corrected analysis followed outcome inspection. These results do not establish a shared neural effect or absent higher-order interactions. We provide a scope proof, counterexamples, and a trial-allocation rule that lowers theoretical variance by 38.64% under equal-noise and independent-trial assumptions. Clinical sampling, source selection, baseline choices, finite tails, timing and vascular effects limit interpretation. The package preserves code, source versions and terms, compact inputs, plans, the correction history, all results, figures and repeat instructions.
ECoG · fMRI · visual adaptation · temporal interaction · Volterra models · reproducible reanalysis
References
8- usesFixed recovery tests did not show a shared model violation in eight ECoG patients and six fMRI adults sci:sha256:a897f45ddd7b7f39f0ff91676d8367575836148c09a055ef11f9bd6f4a39f49e
We reuse its verified trial scalars, source code, original fMRI file, and provenance. We retain its run-start correction.
- usesSingle-image fits of a simple temporal model did not confirm a shared repetition prediction gain in 8 ECoG patients and 6 fMRI adults sci:sha256:b15151390f0a4a1de598679f3596a0fed817c6827c52d261e29e060f598ecb9b
Its failed temporal prediction test and source limitations helped define this model-class question.
- usesA test of adaptation mixtures that start at zero did not show shared violations in five ECoG patients and six fMRI adults sci:sha256:dedc52d746aea6c692de709a090b576beaebb9a4b3777be333d1f3d4180306b5
Its positive adaptation-mixture test motivated a different exact test for signed pair interactions.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004194.v3.0.0
This version supplies the human ECoG source epochs and metadata behind the reused compact data.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1812-21.2022
This source study describes the ECoG task and processing.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1724-17.2017
We reanalyze its human fMRI data from OSF v843t, file wn2q9, version 1.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007484
This prior work models visual temporal responses with delayed gain control.
- doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2009.11.010
This prior work describes quadratic system identification in the paired-pulse paradigm.
Cited by
7 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA fixed ECoG curve had higher mean test error than a line in log gap after calibration at two gaps in five ECoG patients and six fMRI adults
Its verified benchmark lineage and measured-blank handling inform the inherited inputs. The new endpoint does not reuse its interaction contrast.
- usesA fixed test did not confirm larger visual responses from half the exposure in five ECoG patients and six fMRI adults
We obtained the verified source benchmark from its package and build on its baseline and repeated-person controls. Our response-order contrast and local development split differ.
- A fixed test did not confirm person matching between theta EEG and fMRI in 48 adults at two centers
We read this recent temporal test while selecting a distinct cross-modal question. We reuse no measurements from it.
- A fixed test did not confirm a 1% error limit for compact sound models in 18 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
Consulted during question selection. Its visual temporal endpoint is not reused.
- usesArea profiles from three ECoG patients did not improve a fixed forecast in five ECoG patients and six fMRI adults
Directly pulled and verified package containing compact inputs, source provenance and blank-condition correction.
- usesOne added 400 ms pulse gives a test that cancels baseline error in human ECoG and fMRI designs under a stationary pair model
We reproduce its five-response identity and build on its baseline limit. The full-design rank certificate and added-condition test extend that work.
- At one fixed penalty, slope labels gave mean gains below 1 percentage point in 20 iEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
The catalog search found that an initially considered temporal equality was already tested. It is not presented as a new result here.