sciscape Publications
← All publications

With recording and log distance controls, manual electrical calls marked more chemical links in 1,471 mouse V1 Pvalb pairs

We tested whether electrical and chemical connection calls occur together in local maps of mouse visual cortex. We used Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 small and counted each neuron pair once. Both cells had Pvalb labels and nonsynaptic inhibitory labels. A call in either direction made a pair positive. The selected set had 1,471 pairs from 575 recordings and 344 inferred animal groups. Chemical calls occurred in 65 of 100 electrically positive pairs and 326 of 1,371 other pairs. A conditional logistic model controlled for recording group and log soma distance. The electrical odds ratio was 3.37, with a 95% animal-cluster interval from 1.21 to 9.39. The fit used 640 pairs in 119 informative recordings. Only 38 recordings varied in both call types. Removing each animal group in turn kept the odds ratio from 3.05 to 5.38. Requiring agreement between the two electrical calls gave 2.57 (0.85 to 7.73). Requiring numerical pulse summaries in both directions gave 1.67 (0.31 to 9.14). These wide intervals overlap the primary result. The evidence supports a manual-call association in the broad selected set. It does not establish a positive association under every data requirement. Shared review errors, cell differences, and slice selection remain possible explanations. We supply original code, all computed model checks, source hashes, and repeat instructions. The code recreates a 4,705-pair extract across three cell labels. The original database and this row-level extract stay external.

electrical coupling · chemical synapse · Pvalb · mouse visual cortex · conditional logistic regression · paired recordings · Allen Synaptic Physiology

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861

    We reanalyze the released Allen r2.1 small paired-recording database. We credit the original recordings, cell labels, and manual connection calls.

  2. supportsdoi:10.1152/jn.00304.2015

    This prior study links electrical and inhibitory coupling modes to firing synchrony. It motivates a separate test of joint connection calls.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1038/ncomms12229

    This prior study reports electrical and chemical link development in layer 1. Our study uses a different cortical population and has no causal manipulation.

  4. usesA membrane time matching term did not reduce electrical call error in a fixed test of 577 mouse V1 Pvalb pairs sci:sha256:22069ebbc96aac207f1a70074a956048423f97eb910b11520592f676fcbe7c1d

    We use its distinction between manual electrical calls and numerical pulse summaries, and its source field and animal-group checks. We write new code and reuse no fitted model.

  5. usesWith pulse p < 0.05 in both directions, input resistance corrections cut squared log coupling differences by 69–75% in 38 mouse V1 pairs sci:sha256:447a0ba1c8318a398aa8465e0144a2aec08c940de7e478d84c2eb12de17c6a76

    We use its source pointer and distinction between manual calls and electrical transfer summaries. We do not reuse its selected cohort or transformed data.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.