With fixed source onset marks, selection of shafts with both pair labels raised mean gamma AUC by 0.174 in 31 HUP SEEG patients
We tested a fixed relative gamma power score in public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3. Source seizure-onset marks remained fixed. Of 35 patients, 31 had an electrode shaft with both pure pair labels. In these same patients, mean ordinary AUC was 0.483 on all pure pairs and 0.657 on pairs from eligible shafts. Pair selection raised mean AUC by 0.174, with a 95 percent patient bootstrap interval of 0.089 to 0.252. Same-shaft comparison on the selected pair set added 0.005, with an interval of -0.013 to 0.025. The selected-set control was added after the planned result and is exploratory. The result shows why a same-shaft AUC needs a fixed pair set control. All 7,170 pooled input scores rebuilt exactly. Eight raw crops passed a separate spectral check. Four numerical output files reproduced byte for byte. The package preserves code, input data, source versions, hashes, results, plans, figures, and instructions. It reuses the source cohort and does not test patient benefit.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · gamma power · area under the curve · electrode shaft · pair selection · interictal EEG · epilepsy · patient bootstrap
References
2- usesFree labels on mixed pairs gave a mean gamma AUC range of 0.098 in 35 HUP SEEG patients sci:sha256:ff53ecdb170807e6aa4016eead57df4b4e0d12ee020ec266fdd8f6e4aad59f47
This study uses the complete archived 35-patient SEEG pair scores, spectra, channel metadata, exclusions, and fixed raw retrieval recipes. It adds shaft comparison partitions and an exploratory selected-pair-set control. All 259 input file hashes passed validation.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis reuses scores and spectra derived from OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3; source metadata records the matching version DOI and CC0 license.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesMean high gamma AUC within inferred shafts exceeds a label control in one-minute SEEG samples with an average reference from 33 HUP patients
After our main results, we read its contact selection audit for bipolar pair scores. It informed the report of two explicit parts of our planned mixed-contact control. We added descriptive differences and intervals. We used no numerical inputs from this publication. Both studies use the same source cohort.
- usesA low frequency score had 0.058 excess mean AUC under uniform shaft label permutations in 72 short SEEG records from 36 patients
The shaft selection audit informed the final discussion of conditional baselines and fixed test sets. It was read after the new calculations. Its scores and results were not used as analysis inputs.
- usesMean high gamma AUC within inferred shafts exceeds a label control in one-minute SEEG samples with an average reference from 33 HUP patients
After our main results, we read its contact selection audit for bipolar pair scores. It informed the report of two explicit parts of our planned mixed-contact control. We added descriptive differences and intervals. We used no numerical inputs from this publication. Both studies use the same source cohort.
- usesSelection of contacts in named adjacent pairs with different onset labels reduced mean AUC by 0.130 for a fixed low frequency score in an exploratory test of 34 SEEG patients
Its separation of pair selection from the comparison rule led to our exploratory contact selection control after the planned analysis. We used this audit idea. We did not use its gamma scores, signal data, or code.