Eight learned shapes with a retained residual reduced SEEG forecast error in four of eight people at 86 selected sites
We tested a five-pulse SEEG forecast after brain stimulation. Eight learned shapes used only early pulses from the other seven people. A second part retained voltage outside those shapes. Each part had its own fitted noise weight. Five later pulses tested each of 86 selected sites. Mean relative error fell by 0.184% from one full-waveform weight. Four of eight people had lower error. A descriptive fixed-basis resample range was -0.307% to 0.668%; it is not a population confidence interval. Discarding the residual increased mean relative error by 7.990%. A proof shows when separate fixed weights can help under stable independent pulse noise. It does not guarantee a gain for estimated weights. All eight public source files were checked against pinned hashes and reproduced the compact voltages exactly. The package includes data, code, provenance, fitted models, scores, three figures, and replay instructions. The result is exploratory and uses previously tested clinical data.
stereoelectroencephalography · brain stimulation · waveform forecasting · neural signals · donor basis · signal processing
References
6- usesA calibration waveform reduced mean relative six-bit code error at 86 selected processed SEEG sites in eight people with known pulse times sci:sha256:427e137fae1a0a5be2d7bf34368e0e88f4795ad4328b9fd82adb6178d47c6b35
The study uses its selected voltage windows, event maps, source hashes, metadata, and derivative retrieval code.
- usesA three-part test did not establish lower 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error than one scale in eight sessions sci:sha256:3750642d11ed4ab80768651b3daf5b561fbea1c78c7dd75cb9dcef493b4736e6
The study uses its component noise-weight formula and strong full-waveform reference. The new parts are learned span and residual.
- usesEight donor shapes reduced five-pulse SEEG forecast error versus eight cosines at 86 selected sites in eight patients; full waveforms had less error sci:sha256:d5f05d9adcd5c0419c50f10231ba2502cf7acc24728e09a3c09631e52e5a88e3
The study uses its excluded-person donor-basis design. Its compact-template error motivated retaining the orthogonal residual.
- usesGain fits with shifts up to 19.5 ms left 1.93 times the matched control variance in 59 to 460 ms SEEG at 86 selected sites in eight people sci:sha256:e12c7736723be38135302ccdbf9a63fa33886bbb1b8b5746fa0c9430d88dfb38
The study keeps its calibration-only readout choice fixed at all 86 stimulation sites.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The selected processed SEEG inputs and source metadata are from OpenNeuro ds004696, version 1.0.1; the saved version-specific metadata identifies this DOI and a CC0 license.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.