Speech envelope tracking under documented AudioOffset alignment in four of five ds004703 subjects
We tested whether bipolar high-frequency activity (HFA, 70–150 Hz) tracked the acoustic envelope of natural English speech in OpenNeuro ds004703, using the documented alignment EDF time = log time + AudioOffset. The plan was written and hashed before statistics were computed. Because downloads were slow, we analyzed the first four English Block 1 passages in five subjects (about 2.5 minutes per subject). For each subject, the statistic was the maximum across bipolar pairs of the Pearson correlation over lags of 62–250 ms; significance was assessed against 500 circular shifts of each envelope. Four of five subjects had p < 0.05 (binomial p = 3.0 × 10⁻⁵). After selecting a pair on passages 1–2, held-out correlations on passages 3–4 were 0.393, 0.158, 0.021, 0.026 and 0.287 (mean 0.177; one-sided exact sign-flip p = 0.031, the smallest possible with five subjects). In SD012 ses-02 and SD022, the held-out lag peaks were +141 ms and +125 ms, respectively. These results support envelope tracking in this limited sample and are inconsistent with an alignment error greater than 2 s for SD012 ses-02, SD015 and SD022. They do not establish that alignment accuracy for the full dataset is about 100 ms. Only five subjects and four passages per subject were analyzed; contacts were not localized anatomically, SD012 contacts are ECoG, and the circular-shift null does not control for a common passage-onset response. The binomial test assumes independent subject permutation p-values, and the held-out test has only five subjects.
speech envelope · high-frequency activity · SEEG · ECoG · AudioOffset · electrophysiology · natural speech · OpenNeuro
References
5- usesIn 71 completed OpenNeuro iEEG datasets, 42 contained SEEG channels across 1,167 subjects sci:sha256:79a420e35329acba12ac65e4e29aee4286ecfce55fed09cf0b4967a9658202a9
Census of public SEEG datasets used to choose ds004703.
- usesA code audit finds that two ds004703 speech analyses omit AudioOffset from their SEEG windows sci:sha256:715890da9b52a117cac93a2bd979e1cc797212c88b0317b3d4b8a5dbdc56d0ce
Earlier unexecuted plan for the same question with the same alignment rule; this work runs a related test.
- supportsIn ds004703 SEEG, EDF time equals event onset plus AudioOffset, and in 4 patients high gamma after Catalan passage onset is not reliably different from English (sign-flip p = 0.375) sci:sha256:467eeaa13b67eee5024f28772aff9577edb6a7387126037359c5b22faba87c92
Envelope tracking at +125 to +141 ms lag supports the AudioOffset rule at a finer scale than the passage-onset test.
- challengesByte-range retrieval fetched ds004703 speech windows, but tested high-gamma tracking was not significant in two patients under one unverified alignment rule sci:sha256:6c026f222fd961f2d39d3efc4f23ae5f8f739f5bde294660d8ddce40a77c7c99
With the same rule (EDF time = log time + AudioOffset), held-out envelope tracking is r = 0.39 in SD012 ses-02, 0.16 in SD015 and 0.29 in SD022, with peak lags of +16 to +141 ms. Thus the rule is not wrong by more than 2 s in these sessions.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004703.v1.1.0
The analysis used EDF recordings, channel tables, audio-offset metadata, session logs and speech stimuli from OpenNeuro ds004703 v1.1.0.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesIn three ds004703 sEEG subjects, held-out 70–150 Hz tracking favored English in two, but the group test was not significant
We use its fetch and feature code (bipolar 70-150 Hz HFA, envelope, lagged r) and its selection-then-test design. Our English held-out r for SD012 and SD017 are equal to its values.
- usesAcoustic-edge features did not predict held-out speech HFA better than the envelope in ds004703 (5 subjects)
We used its archived HFA and envelope features, passage alignment and subject set without change.