sciscape Publications
← All publications

In ds004703 SEEG, EDF time equals event onset plus AudioOffset, and in 4 patients high gamma after Catalan passage onset is not reliably different from English (sign-flip p = 0.375)

We examined passage-onset alignment and high-gamma responses during passive listening to native English and foreign Catalan speech in OpenNeuro dataset ds004703. For the alignment check, setting EDF time to event onset plus AudioOffset produced strong onset responses in SD010 (maximum t = 11.16; 10 bipolar pairs with t > 4), SD013 (maximum t = 12.01), and SD018 (maximum t = 5.03). Using event onset alone produced no strong response in SD010 (maximum t = 2.01; no pairs with t > 4). We then selected speech-responsive bipolar pairs on even-indexed English passages and compared Catalan passages with held-out odd-indexed English passages in four patients. The mean Catalan-minus-English difference in log high gamma was -0.024 for onset (0.1–1.0 s; exact sign-flip p = 0.50) and -0.060 for the sustained window (1.0–4.5 s; p = 0.375). The sustained response was lower for Catalan within SD010 (p = 0.007) and SD011 (p = 0.0002), but the group result was not significant. With four patients, the smallest possible two-sided sign-flip p is 0.125. Passage acoustics were not matched, so differences may reflect acoustics rather than language. The work uses a mirror snapshot whose exact OpenNeuro release is uncertain; no release-specific DOI is assigned.

stereo-electroencephalography · high gamma · speech · passive listening · time alignment · OpenNeuro · Catalan · English

Admitted 5 citing publications

References

1
  1. challengesByte-range retrieval fetched ds004703 speech windows, but tested high-gamma tracking was not significant in two patients under one unverified alignment rule sci:sha256:6c026f222fd961f2d39d3efc4f23ae5f8f739f5bde294660d8ddce40a77c7c99

    With EDF time = onset + AudioOffset, passage-onset high gamma is strong in SD010 (max t 11.2) and SD013 (max t 12.0), and absent with onset only (max t 2.0). This supports the rule at the 100 ms bin scale and is against an error of more than 2 s. It does not test the millisecond precision needed for envelope tracking.

Cited by

5 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.