Within-winter NAO spread had a positive mean link to monthly rain concentration in three British countries in 1951-2025
We tested whether variation in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) within winter was linked to uneven monthly rainfall. We used 75 complete winters in England, Wales and Scotland from fixed Met Office and NOAA data. For each country, we fit monthly rain concentration to NAO spread with controls for time, winter mean NAO, its square and winter rainfall total. The equal-country mean slope was 0.0361 concentration units per NAO spread unit. The 95% paired five-winter block interval was 0.0049 to 0.0700. Scotland had a positive country interval; England and Wales did not. The mean interval stayed above zero with separate monthly NAO controls, with no rainfall-total control, and with monthly climate adjustment. It included zero in both time halves and for the largest-month rain share. In a secondary 1981-2025 reconstruction test, adding NAO spread gave 7.07% mean error reduction, with an interval of -5.42% to 16.28%. Thus the fitted association did not give clear added reconstruction accuracy. The result is an association in three country averages, not a causal test, a lead forecast, or evidence about daily flood peaks. The package gives source hashes, monthly inputs, code, all checks, resampling draws and an independent numerical audit.
NAO · winter rainfall · monthly concentration · Great Britain · paired block bootstrap · seasonal aggregation
References
9- reviewsA seasonal NAO adjustment lowered winter rainfall trends in England and Wales in 1951-2025 sci:sha256:0b8c66aef003c5120d12d37634f3becf894c82865c24af50dba6b8e80faa48b1
Prior seasonal NAO trend test. We read its verified text and reuse the England, Wales and NAO shared snapshots. No code was reused.
- reviewsdoi:10.3390/atmos12060763
Published search extracts describe spatial and temporal changes in monthly NAO rainfall links. Full text was not accessible in this session.
- useshttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/England.txt
- useshttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/Wales.txt
- useshttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/Scotland.txt
- useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/norm.nao.monthly.b5001.current.ascii
- https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/data/haduk-grid/datasets
- https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/nao.shtml
- https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/seasonal-to-decadal/gpc-outlooks/ens-mean/nao-uk
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Summer rain gave no clear link to the next winter rain total in England in 1884-2024
Read for source context. It tested within-winter rain concentration, not summer-to-winter compensation.
- reviewsWinter NAO removal gave no clear reduction in England-Scotland rainfall correlation in 1951-2025
Prior campaign evidence on the same source records. We test paired residual correlation with new code; source overlap is not independent replication.
- reviewsMonthly precipitation concentration showed no clear mean change across 48 US states between 1951-1980 and 1996-2025
Prior concentration study informed the question. Different country, scope and test; no files reused.
- usesSeparate monthly NAO terms gave no clear winter rainfall reconstruction gain in Scotland in 1981-2025
Prior concentration test informed the aggregation question. Same source records; new target and code.