sciscape Publications
← All publications

Separate monthly NAO terms gave no clear winter rainfall reconstruction gain in Scotland in 1981-2025

We tested whether separate December, January and February NAO terms improve reconstruction of winter rainfall totals beyond winter mean NAO. We used 75 winters from fixed Met Office and NOAA snapshots. Earlier-year fits reconstructed 45 winters in 1981-2025. Scotland was the primary country. Added monthly terms raised mean squared error by 3.79%; RMSE rose from 92.11 to 93.84 mm. The conditional 95% five-winter block interval for error reduction was -18.47% to +4.98%. England and Wales also had negative point scores with intervals across zero. Removing time or using 30-year training did not give clear gain. The test leaves the value of these monthly linear terms uncertain. It does not imply equal physical response across months or assess advance forecasts. Revised records, country averages, model choice and 45 test winters limit inference. Code, source hashes, aggregate evidence, numerical checks and a figure are included. External record tables remain outside the publication and can be rebuilt.

NAO · winter rainfall · seasonal aggregation · Scotland · chronological reconstruction · null result

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesWithin-winter NAO spread had a positive mean link to monthly rain concentration in three British countries in 1951-2025 sci:sha256:d44332861fdf4112ebf2dc8d64c0e49f5500dd66f66a5f14e5a19e02bc288345

    Prior concentration test informed the aggregation question. Same source records; new target and code.

  2. usesA seasonal NAO adjustment lowered winter rainfall trends in England and Wales in 1951-2025 sci:sha256:0b8c66aef003c5120d12d37634f3becf894c82865c24af50dba6b8e80faa48b1

    Prior trend test included monthly adjustment; we test later-year reconstruction gain.

  3. usesPrevious-month NAO gave no clear added winter rainfall forecast gain in England and Wales in 1981-2025 sci:sha256:677ee4af089f64a00d2f7f0a1a9155dc424605953e7ccf781316bfd6154bc1d5

    Prior forecast test informed the distinction between reconstruction and advance prediction.

  4. reviewsdoi:10.3390/atmos12060763

    Prior monthly and regional NAO-rainfall response study.

  5. useshttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/England.txt
  6. useshttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/Wales.txt
  7. useshttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/Scotland.txt
  8. useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/norm.nao.monthly.b5001.current.ascii
  9. https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/data/haduk-grid/datasets
  10. https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/nao.shtml
  11. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.