Released MNI HFO onset order repeated on average between half-hour periods in 18 UCLA SEEG sleep records
We tested onset order of released MNI HFO marks on different SEEG shafts in OpenNeuro ds005398 version 1.1.3. Training used the first half hour. Testing used the next half hour. The sample had 18 UCLA patients and 3,374 oriented channel pairs. We joined marks within 50 ms and used 25 ms circular lag counts with nine within-block shift controls. The equal patient mean normalized score was 0.00879. The descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 0.00163 to 0.01965. Fourteen patients had positive scores. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip p value was 0.00151 under independent patients and null sign symmetry. The largest patient contributed 54 percent of the signed sum. The mean stayed positive after any one patient was removed. Removing circular wraparound had little effect. The result measures short-term detector timing. It does not establish neural propagation, transfer across dates, or clinical value. The package preserves pinned public marks, hashes, code, full scores, uncertainty arrays, checks, figures, and repeat instructions. This is a secondary analysis of a known cohort.
high frequency oscillations · stereoelectroencephalography · onset order · event timing · repeatability · intracranial EEG
References
6- usesJoining released STE marks within 50 ms reduced first hour counts by 10.3% in 18 SEEG sleep records sci:sha256:b82f10c39a98d9dd89862ddb4b48266895b4f5a50f06fee0d0e478eb897c5cd7
We used the pinned public mark archive and the MIT retrieval code. We made a new onset-order analysis from these source bytes.
- usesCombined HFO marks on contacts 1–2 had 44.8 percent direction agreement across dates in seven SEEG patients for 2–25 ms delays sci:sha256:7dd6de9e533d02e8c2a48a30b33300263c3ff3cf65c28e94ee3aa03d28b0da7c
We read its across-date onset-order result after our first primary scores. It gives context from a different source. It did not change the fixed primary plan.
- usesShared contact links had higher excess STE HFO coincidence than disjoint links at 25 ms in 16 UCLA SEEG patients after equal count thinning sci:sha256:b34607b486fa576d8b60f99faaaa9c37bbef35c9aaee7c374589908862995394
Its contact-sharing result helped define the different-shaft restriction. It uses the same source cohort and is prior context.
- usesHFO overlap onset order within 10 ms had 50.2 percent mean prediction accuracy across sleep records from seven SEEG patients sci:sha256:8ac2b34dba4d0329a022045111225173c5ca889e5879debe4a4caba8cd98e2dc
We read its across-record onset-order result after our first primary scores. It gives context from a different source. It did not change the fixed primary plan.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005398.v1.1.3
This is the exact OpenNeuro version used for the detector marks and metadata; the pinned source manifest records its commit and source file hashes.
- doi:10.1111/epi.18545
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesEarly channel corrections reduced mean later detector timing error across 18 SEEG sleep records at a 20 ms match limit
We read the released onset order finding to define the secondary detector agreement question. We preserved that description. We did not reuse its onset order score or claim independent replication.
- usesReleased STE counts kept a higher mean SOZ AUC after at most two shaft omissions per patient that kept both classes in 18 first-hour SEEG records
Used its exact compressed ds005398 v1.1.3 source files and pinned source manifest for 18 SEEG patients. Wrote new count and omission code. Did not use its onset-order results.
- usesEarly channel corrections reduced mean later detector timing error across 18 SEEG sleep records at a 20 ms match limit
We read the released onset order finding to define the secondary detector agreement question. We preserved that description. We did not reuse its onset order score or claim independent replication.
- usesMidpoint times lowered the mean MNI HFO order score at 25 ms in 18 SEEG sleep records with fixed onset directions
We used the onset score, source parser, interval join, circular counter, code notice, and earlier patient results. All 18 primary onset patient scores matched exactly. The new audit kept the same pairs and fitted onset directions while it changed the test event time.