Peptide channel terms gave an uncertain 1.93% timing error reduction in a nested ridge test of 739 C. elegans kernels
We tested whether possible peptide channels help predict fitted calcium response timing beyond wired structure, cell identity, and expression breadth. We joined a pinned C. elegans signal atlas, corrected Cook wiring, and the February 2024 peptide map. The main panel had 739 directions and 151 neurons. A nested ridge model added 92 channel terms to controls that included channel count. Mean squared log-time error fell from 0.272068 to 0.266815, a 1.93% reduction. A central 95% range from 199 complete network weight refits was -5.56% to +6.89%, where positive values mean lower error. One alternate split gave a loss. The known map exceeded 198 of 199 altered specificity maps, for descriptive rank 0.010. A later baseline with indicators for each observed channel count left a 1.70% gain, with refit range -4.24% to +6.84% and specificity rank 0.020. The count-shape check did not explain the full point gain, but a stable prediction benefit remains uncertain. Timing describes fitted calcium filters, not synaptic delay or receptor kinetics. The ranges are conditional on one atlas and exclude animal variation and kernel-fit uncertainty. The package preserves the joined data, source versions and hashes, code, plans, fitted states, predictions, all refit and control scores, figures, and repeat instructions.
Caenorhabditis elegans · connectome · structure and function · neuropeptide · response timing · molecular specificity · grouped validation · open benchmark
References
12- usesThe Cook whole-animal map gave no clear timing prediction gain over older wiring in a ridge test of 739 C. elegans kernels sci:sha256:0ba5b94440e61009d4351f44c2906f291127e2b02f31ef4ad0aeaf8dbbc079be
We reuse its numerical timing benchmark and corrected Cook and older wiring summaries. We check the joined facts against original data.
- usesPeptide pair counts raised ridge test error by 0.20% for WT and unc-31 response differences in 1,342 C. elegans atlas pairs sci:sha256:420ace74dc1471ff31827379a23611523568d979e5fe8b384a687179fd3335ab
We reuse its numerical expression facts, whole-profile groups, and molecular channel names. This study changes the outcome from strain magnitude differences to fitted timing.
- A peptide match count gave no stable prediction gain in fixed tests of 1,278 C. elegans response directions sci:sha256:3018776ea40d60cb03a98946ae55b67eeafde1153c906d69ac22d5b59fab6cd1
Earlier work tested peptide compatibility against binary response detection. Our test concerns temporal center.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4
Source measurements and fitted signal propagation kernels.
- usesdoi:10.17605/OSF.IO/E2SYT
Original signal propagation data collection. Exact analyzed export commit and hash are preserved.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.043
Source peptide channel model, interpreted as possible communication support.
- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6895870.v1
Versioned source peptide data collection. Analysis pins the February 2024 repository update.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.023
Expression source used by the molecular map and profile grouping.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113058
Peptide-receptor interaction source used by the molecular map.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7
Corrected July 2020 whole-animal wiring summaries for the main reference model.
- usesdoi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056
Older wiring source for the planned anatomy check.
- doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
Anatomical data source represented in the reused timing benchmark.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Peptide channel terms raised ridge test error by 0.27% for an early minus late calcium contrast in 104 C. elegans worms
Its pooled-kernel timing test motivates this different response-window test with whole animals excluded.