The reverse PSP reduced squared log amplitude test error by 29% in 88 mouse V1 cell pairs with each test mouse excluded from fitting
We tested whether one measured postsynaptic potential (PSP) helps predict the opposite direction in a reciprocal cell pair. We used the public mouse V1 data of Znamenskiy et al. The source already reported correlated strengths. We rebuilt responses from the first 20 accepted traces and recovered 88 pairs from 29 mice, with 58 PV cells and 79 pyramidal cells. Each test mouse was excluded from fitting. A fixed linear model used distance, mean signed recording depth and age. Adding log excitatory PSP reduced squared log inhibitory PSP error from 0.109431 to 0.077175, a 29.48% reduction. The central 95% range from 2,000 mouse resamples with full refitting was 7.24% to 47.50%. All sensitivity point gains were positive. A later control for both mean recording voltages retained a 28.95% gain. Partner shuffles within each PV cell gave a mean gain of 13.56%; four of 999 reached the recorded gain. These are descriptive assignment controls. We also recovered the source visual-response counts and rounded correlations. In 31 reciprocal pairs with visual responses, the further gain after visual similarity was 25.61%, but its resample range was -35.68% to 55.87%. This smaller test was inconclusive. The main result supports a scoped prediction rule for detected reciprocal pairs in one study. It does not measure conductance or establish a plasticity mechanism or transfer to another laboratory. The package preserves code, provenance, all derived input tables, predictions, fold coefficients, resamples, figures and repeat instructions. Independent trace and solver checks passed.
reciprocal connections · synaptic strength · structure and function · visual cortex · parvalbumin · prediction · reproducibility
References
4- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.013
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We recover its reciprocal pair counts and its Figure 4 counts and rounded visual-response correlations, then test prediction across excluded mice.
- usesdoi:10.25418/crick.23295188.v1
Version 1 supplies raw patch traces, mouse dates and matched visual responses.
- In one MICrONS graph model, site distance reduced a reverse cleft size test gain from 1.32% to 0.062% sci:sha256:b9a77628d754ea0e932a9f0361e80d99c976fecfc701e2e1e19807f96f92a4d5
It tests reverse-direction completion with anatomical cleft size and shows the importance of measurement-specific controls. Our outcome is physiological voltage, in a separate study.
- In two mouse V1 projects, inhibitory onset delays were 0.23–0.37 ms shorter within 230 two-way cell pairs sci:sha256:81bf50b4911778b846bceb6ae0cef305359ef8e899912b429e779c464f74793f
It tests paired excitatory and inhibitory delays. Our test instead measures the value of reverse PSP amplitude for prediction.
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFree factors for both cells left three strength contrasts in 88 reciprocal mouse V1 pairs
We verified its signed package, used its 88-pair table to cross-check independent source extraction, and reused its MIT range downloader unchanged. It established a prediction result with test mice excluded from fitting.
- Excitatory paired-pulse ratios gave no clear gain in inhibitory ratio prediction for 48 reciprocal mouse V1 pairs
This earlier study tested reverse first-strength prediction across excluded mice. We test a separate repeated-response property.
- usesVisual similarity gave no clear gain in a fixed ridge test of 5 to 30 ms voltage shapes in 88 mouse V1 connections
We reuse amplitude and visual-match audit tables, source provenance and the HTTP-range downloader. We rebuild the tested data from the original MAT files.
- At 30 Hz, local voltage products fell while total peak products had no clear fall in 60 reciprocal PV–pyramidal pairs from mouse V1
This new SCI work uses the same source V1 recordings and 88 reciprocal pairs to test reverse amplitude prediction. We test a distinct two-pulse product and baseline comparison. The studies share biological data.
- Reverse current gave no clear added strength prediction in 69 reciprocal mouse V1 pairs with test mice excluded
This earlier voltage completion test motivates animal-separated prediction of reverse current in different data.
- Visual similarity was linked to common voltage strength in 31 selected reciprocal pairs from mouse V1
Prior test of predicting reverse PSP strength. The present test separates common first-voltage strength from its reciprocal ratio.