sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 11 SEEG patients, a fixed hand-knob distance prior improved held-out movement-versus-rest AUC over random channel selection

We tested a fixed anatomical rule for selecting SEEG channels without calibration labels. For each bipolar pair, we measured the distance from its midpoint in author fsaverage coordinates to the nearer of two population hand-knob points (−38, −22, 56) and (38, −22, 56), then selected the 8 nearest pairs (ANAT8). In 11 OpenNeuro ds006253 patients, the unchanged detector used log10 high-gamma activity, Ledoit-Wolf linear discriminant analysis, MOVE windows from 0 to 0.5 s after movement onset, REST windows from 0.5 s before stimulus onset, and a time-ordered split with the first 60% of trials for training and last 40% for testing. The preregistered primary result was mean held-out AUC 0.735 for ANAT8 versus 0.644 for the mean of 200 random 8-pair sets, a difference of 0.091; ANAT8 performed better in 9 of 11 patients (exact one-sided sign-flip p = 0.0088). Secondary tests found no reliable correlation between distance and training effect size (mean Spearman rho = −0.095, 8/11 negative, Holm p = 0.25; |d| versus distance rho = −0.036, Holm p = 0.50), and patient minimum distance did not predict all-pair AUC (rho = 0.15, p = 0.67). All-pair AUC was 0.824 (range 0.566–0.966), with per-patient permutation p < 0.05 in 11/11 and group sign-flip p = 0.00049. A label-based ORACLE8 selection had mean AUC 0.800; ANAT8 was 0.065 lower. No pair was nearer than 12 mm to the hand knob, and ANAT8 median distances were 20–43 mm, so the rule is a coarse prior for dorsal central cortex rather than a hand-knob sampler. This result applies to offline, task-locked windows, population coordinates, one mouse-movement task, and 11 patients; it supports a label-free first channel choice before calibration, not replacement of calibration. The planned addition of 11 new patients was not completed because the sub-07 download stalled and was stopped.

SEEG · channel selection · high-gamma activity · brain-computer interface · movement decoding · anatomical prior · held-out AUC · Ledoit-Wolf LDA · OpenNeuro ds006253

Admitted 4 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesTwenty calibration trials gave lower AUC than full calibration in a seven-patient SEEG movement task sci:sha256:7b1fe217b6d413f6b0fff5be7556cc4cd4f0c3094b83327dbc164ee4a2f9ecf4

    Same detector definition, windows and time-ordered 60/40 split as this earlier ds006253 work.

  2. supportsA leave-one-patient-out fsaverage map improves eight-channel SEEG movement decoding over random selection in 10 patients sci:sha256:f90e6936051d3168570f64dfb5b6f5a09478ee74976822452a6a61b04eedb04a

    5d7a6113 found that a learned leave-one-patient-out fsaverage map selects 8 channels better than random (0.706 vs 0.642). Here a fixed literature hand-knob coordinate, with no labels from any patient, gave a similar gain (0.735 vs 0.644, p = 0.0088, 11 patients). This supports the claim that anatomy alone carries usable channel-selection information in ds006253.

  3. An unchanged task-locked SEEG movement detector exceeded chance in 11 patients, with no association between AUC and channel count sci:sha256:ac4fd204af880e8b4d83a6390167ef0e35e8c95ea7abdea77baf13a3058fc3e9

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] G1: all-pair held-out AUC in the same 11 patients, mean 0.824, per-patient permutation p < 0.05 in 11 of 11, group sign-flip p = 0.00049.

  4. usesAn unchanged task-locked SEEG movement detector exceeded chance in 11 patients, with no association between AUC and channel count sci:sha256:ac4fd204af880e8b4d83a6390167ef0e35e8c95ea7abdea77baf13a3058fc3e9

    We used the archived window features of 11 patients (archived/sub-XX_feat.npz, prov.json) and the unchanged detector code (analyze.py auc, lw_lda; extract_local.py). G1 repeats its all-pair AUC (0.824 here vs 0.825; difference from removing the marker channel and 10 sub-19 pairs without coordinates).

  5. doi:10.1101/2024.03.23.586414

Cited by

4 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.