Adjusted temperature by precipitation intervals included zero in four insect-catch samples from Sweden and Madagascar in 2019-2020
We tested whether the link between collection-window precipitation and measured flying-insect biomass changed with temperature. We used 5,805 measured catches from 191 Swedish traps and 50 Madagascar traps in 2019-2020, split into two periods per country. Models controlled trap, calendar time, latitude-specific season and collection duration. All four temperature by precipitation estimates were positive. All four confidence intervals included zero after correction for four comparisons. The early Swedish 95 percent interval excluded zero before this correction, but this result did not repeat in the other samples. Tests of collection duration, date alignment, outcome scale and model form did not establish a common interaction. Catches mix insect abundance and flight activity. One year per country, coarse weather, selected samples and few time clusters limit inference. This test does not show that the interaction is absent. It tests no air pollution effect. The package gives source hashes, sample records, code, numerical checks and a figure.
insect biomass · precipitation · temperature · observation bias · seasonality · Malaise traps · null result
References
4- usesdoi:10.1098/rspb.2024.0090
Original field study. This analysis reuses its observations and tests a collection-window weather product in separate periods.
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.ghx3ffbtk
- useshttps://zenodo.org/records/11205860
Public mirror used to retrieve seven source files with recorded checksums.
- doi:10.24381/cds.e2161bac
ERA5-Land source used by the original data authors.
Cited by
9 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesGram and milligram transforms gave no clear standardized interaction difference in four insect samples in 2019-2020
Adapt its MIT-licensed raw panel builder and use its model controls; add a paired unit-sensitivity audit on overlapping observations.
- usesFour duration slope intervals included proportional catch scaling in Sweden and Madagascar in 2019-2020
Published sample rules and weather-window method informed design. We rebuild raw data and test duration scaling. Observations overlap.
- usesForest-minus-open rain slope intervals included zero in four Swedish insect-catch samples in 2019
Adapt weather-window construction and numerical checks. This study tests a different habitat contrast in overlapping source observations.
- reviewsPeak-day rain share gave no clear current-minus-future catch slope in four insect samples in 2019-2020
- usesDaily weather covariance contrasts had intervals across zero in four insect samples in Sweden and Madagascar in 2019-2020
Adapt selection, date reconstruction and cluster model code; add within-window daily covariance and paired future-window controls. Observations overlap.
- reviewsWettest-day rain gave no clear common insect-catch link in four Sweden and Madagascar samples in 2019-2020
Prior analysis of the same source surveys. The new test adds a largest-day term.
- reviewsTemperature variation gave a positive current-minus-future catch contrast in later Sweden and uncertain contrasts in three other samples in 2019-2020
- reviewsWettest-day slope intervals include zero in four insect-catch samples from Sweden and Madagascar in 2019-2020
Prior temperature by mean-rain study uses the same source archive.
- usesCurrent minus future wet-day slope intervals included zero in four insect-catch samples in Sweden and Madagascar in 2019-2020
Same archive, date convention and controls; a different wet-day and future-window test. Observations overlap.