Count differences between two adult maps gave no clear gain in a ridge test of response spread across worms for 370 C. elegans neuron pairs
We tested whether differences in chemical site counts between two adult C. elegans brain maps add information about calcium response spread across measured worms. We joined pinned Witvliet adult maps to event-labelled responses from DANDI 001075 version 0.240930.1859. We averaged repeated events within each worm and measured the variance of worm means for 370 directed pairs with at least three worms. The panel used 2,460 target observations from 97 worms. A nested ridge test kept source cell groups out of fitting. Controls included mean adult count, cell terms, electrical counts and measured response and assay summaries. Adding squared relative count mismatch reduced test error from 0.914173 to 0.913076, or 0.120%. The descriptive source-group range was -0.024% to 0.282%; the target-group range was -0.089% to 0.316%. Both include zero. Removing pairs with one total site gave a 0.456% error increase. A stricter test excluded test groups from both endpoint roles and gave a 0.045% increase. Two hundred refits with shared positive worm weights gave a gain range of -0.114% to 0.527%. Repeated stimuli gave an excess variance estimate of 0.0682 above sampling variance in 103 wired pairs, against within-worm variance 0.5138. Its source-group range included zero. This excess can include state and assay effects. The evidence gives no clear added mismatch gain in this fixed test. It does not establish equal function across different wirings. Only two anatomical animals were available, and they differed from the response animals. The package preserves inputs, source hashes, code, models, predictions, figures and repeat instructions. Raw spot checks matched 1,867 observations. A clean repeat matched 138 numerical files and 920 arrays.
connectome · Caenorhabditis elegans · signal propagation · animal variation · synapse counts · response variance · optogenetics · reproducibility
References
9- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
The two adult chemical maps and neuronal groups are the anatomical source.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4
The source study measured signal propagation after single-neuron activation.
- usesdoi:10.48324/dandi.001075/0.240930.1859
This fixed CC BY 4.0 release is the raw event and fluorescence source. We independently checked three NWB files.
- usesAnatomical paths reduced mean calcium prediction error in 103 C. elegans animals excluded from training sci:sha256:a10115ec5ae0e7b414c52276d1b6d39d2529e9168b00f3fed9ac6719192f7206
We use its verified event-labelled numerical response benchmark and electrical graph facts. We do not copy its code.
- usesCombining left and right neurons gave unsupported two-step chemical routes among 162 embryonic neurons in eight C. elegans brain maps sci:sha256:cda9ce7e66e433a33d24ffa8906f2c55ab57a5f3fb68d013158c1741572511c2
We use the verified numerical chemical-count extract and node groups. An independent raw JSON recount matched every adult edge.
- Stable chemical connections across eight C. elegans connectomes did not propagate optogenetic signals more often than variable connections at matched adult synapse count sci:sha256:5cbb4c1917dff79c9e9f17c6ff6ae5d0ba556de73d1a96c2f13df319c7fef4d0
This prior study tested structural consistency for response detection. The current outcome is spread across named animals.
- With source groups excluded, nine wiring terms raised error by 0.19% for the variance of three transformed values in 6,270 C. elegans response lists sci:sha256:5713a36007ca13a1adc69883e35f5516db6718c7177ae2a07b2fdf55e6d43088
This prior response-spread test used pooled lists without animal identities. The current event-labelled test separates within-worm repeats from variation across worms.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7
The corrected July 2020 hermaphrodite map is the source of the electrical control supplied with the event benchmark.
- Nine wiring terms gave no clear gain in a fixed prediction test of same-side response contrasts in 1,381 C. elegans class pairs sci:sha256:41b15854cd8523c5ffd0b63681f8b54798c97d57f265ff77870b2e99ead7941f
This is the provenance source of the Cook graph facts passed through the verified response benchmark.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Centered source contrasts agreed across repeats in a fixed calcium test of 45 C. elegans worms
This earlier study includes repeated-response variance components. We test centered source contrasts across a common target panel.
- Repeat correction cut mean squared contrast distance by 83% in 22 C. elegans worms with matched sources and targets
This prior study tested wiring mismatch and response spread across worms and included a univariate repeat-variance correction. We add a matched multivariate source-contrast comparison.