sciscape Publications
← All publications

Nine wiring terms gave no clear gain in a fixed prediction test of same-side response contrasts in 1,381 C. elegans class pairs

We tested whether a whole-animal wiring map predicts responses on the same side relative to the opposite side. We used 1,381 ordered pairs of named bilateral neuron classes from a fixed wild-type C. elegans signal atlas. Each pair had four source-side and target-side response lists, each with at least three finite values. We transformed each value with asinh(x/0.1). The outcome was the mean same-side response minus the mean opposite-side response. This contrast cancels additive source and target effects. The primary graph retained all 302 neurons in the Cook hermaphrodite map corrected in July 2020. Nine anatomy terms described direct weights, two-step routes, and sums of walks. A grouped nested ridge test gave squared error 0.063387, against 0.063110 for the training mean. Error rose by 0.44%. The central 95% class-weight range for error reduction was -2.00% to +0.84%, with predictions fixed. Four older maps gave no clear gain on the same functional panel. Under independent random splits of fixed response lists, the same-side contrast had expected centered product -0.008955. A later orthogonal component check gave +0.182925 for the common response. These conditional split results do not estimate repeatability in new animals. The export cannot align shared events across lists. The result therefore does not show biological symmetry or separate measurement limits from model limits. We preserve a matched benchmark, all five neuronal graphs, code, provenance, model states, results, figures, and repeat instructions.

connectome · Caenorhabditis elegans · structure and function · bilateral neurons · signal propagation · response contrasts · ridge regression · reproducible benchmark

Admitted 15 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4

    This study supplied the single-neuron stimulation response atlas.

  2. usesdoi:10.17605/OSF.IO/E2SYT

    This is the source signal atlas data record. The analysis uses the pinned WormNeuroAtlas export stated in the text.

  3. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7

    This study supplied whole-animal anatomy. We use its July 2020 corrected hermaphrodite matrices.

  4. usesdoi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056

    The two older anatomy exports supply separate graph checks.

  5. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8

    The two adult maps supply separate graph checks.

  6. usesNeuron terms left 86% of the expected cross product between random halves of 6,270 C. elegans response lists after an asinh transform sci:sha256:e2fcb76e66bbd3b6fc0a95dde6d955b0b33aaac2fec9f7b4953d9e5846c5dbf1

    We extend its exact moments for independent partitions of fixed response lists to an orthogonal basis of four responses.

  7. usesThe Cook whole-animal map gave no clear timing prediction gain over older wiring in a ridge test of 739 C. elegans kernels sci:sha256:0ba5b94440e61009d4351f44c2906f291127e2b02f31ef4ad0aeaf8dbbc079be

    Its source hashes and native name audit guided use of the corrected Cook workbook.

  8. Mirror response labels gave 2.0 percent lower mean Brier error in a fixed test of 4,017 C. elegans atlas entries sci:sha256:d26ef6c8e859e13216e71965551d5567f5d53b0452a66d465be38392e448549d

    This earlier study tested mirror detection labels. Our target is a contrast of four continuous responses.

  9. Mirror synapse counts did not lower response detection error in 9,725 C. elegans atlas pairs under a fixed logistic model sci:sha256:31d7cbed99711ba434d5034c945d38abf50c3d044885dcfaab1070d6c5aced34

    This earlier study tested mirror anatomy counts against response detection.

  10. doi:10.1103/6wgv-b9m6

    This study compared anatomical and signalling network organization.

  11. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009212

    This paper gives prior methods for model evaluation with variable responses.

Cited by

15 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.