Wiring profile gains changed sign across five ridge splits of two-way response differences in 1,855 C. elegans atlas pairs
We tested whether complete wiring profiles predict differences between opposite stimulation directions in a fixed C. elegans calcium atlas. We used all 1,855 exact neuron pairs with at least six stored response values in each direction. Graph calculations retained all 302 canonical neuronal slots in five anatomical maps. The main ridge baseline controlled neuron effects, measurement counts, direct and path counts, and soma geometry. Adding 120 antisymmetric profile products raised mean squared error by 1.52% in the fixed main split. Four other planned splits gave decreases of 0.50% to 1.25%. For reciprocal means, symmetric profiles reduced error by 1.26% to 5.66% across all five splits. Both main endpoint-weight ranges included zero. A second test reproduced an earlier model on 6,270 response directions exactly. A symmetric profile term retained 92.37% of its full 4.62% error decrease. Thus, the earlier aggregate profile gain did not establish a stable gain for direction differences. This is a prediction test within one summary atlas. It does not test biological reciprocity or prediction in independent animals. Animal and event identifiers are absent. The package includes complete graph arrays, the paired benchmark, code, source hashes, all predictions and model states, figures, and repeat instructions. A source rebuild and complete numerical replay passed.
connectome · C. elegans · signal propagation · response direction · pairwise prediction · symmetric kernels · reproducibility
References
13- usesNeuron wiring profiles reduced ridge prediction error by 5.44% in a fixed test of 6,270 C. elegans atlas responses sci:sha256:82205b10c90963e96ba501cad1ac1abbfd2de6ce626ff95dc6c2fbf361413e21
We reuse the signed numerical inputs and MIT profile code. We reproduce its geometry-controlled prediction and test even and odd profile terms.
- A synapse count rule selected the larger absolute calcium response in 140 of 310 C. elegans atlas pairs with at least five trials per direction sci:sha256:8415f4434c1d662db2900bdc7768e73baa29298f62a5ac491f42f08e0f9cca2a
The earlier paired direction benchmark motivates a broader test with continuous signed contrasts and complete wiring profiles.
- Terms for wiring direction raised Brier error in fixed WT and unc-31 models of 3,261 C. elegans atlas pairs sci:sha256:ee400d9bbdac90339b80dc2aa2c5f80acbe6aab928af804f74d149eb15909a65
Prior direction detection results set the scope of our new continuous-response test.
- With free cell gains, changes within 1.25 sample standard errors allowed a reciprocal fit to 109 selected C. elegans response pairs sci:sha256:cd8e2262408cdd13ad3f6faa138f2b822a795ac9f993a1571ead9954cd16076a
Free cell gain analysis explains why response differences alone do not test biological reciprocity.
- usesNine wiring terms gave no clear gain in a fixed prediction test of same-side response contrasts in 1,381 C. elegans class pairs sci:sha256:41b15854cd8523c5ffd0b63681f8b54798c97d57f265ff77870b2e99ead7941f
The inherited MIT source reader retains the complete neuronal graphs.
- doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4
- doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/E2SYT
- doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7
- doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056
- doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
- doi:10.1103/6wgv-b9m6
- doi:10.1101/2024.09.22.614271
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.1506.05950
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Chemical arrow reversal left profile similarity unchanged with equal input and output weights in five C. elegans maps
This related study tested differences between opposite stimulation directions. Our graph reversal test asks a separate question.
- A nested ridge test selected no wiring terms for response direction differences in 96 C. elegans worms
Related tests of wiring prediction for direction differences in a pooled atlas.
- Products from different animals cut the mean squared direction difference estimate by 94% in 1,759 C. elegans pairs
Prior wiring-profile tests gave unstable gains for opposite-direction response differences.