A fixed rank test found no clear extra calcium coincidence in spine triplets within 5 µm in 18 mice
Nearby synaptic inputs can act together on a dendrite. We asked if groups of three nearby spines had more large calcium amplitudes on the same trial than spread groups. We used public visual cortex data from mice. We ranked signed amplitudes within each stimulus direction and marked the two largest of eight to ten common trials. The main test used 539 compact triplets and 42,634 spread triplets in 178 fields from 21 neurons and 18 mice. All pairs had no separating branch point and were at least 2 µm apart by path and straight-line distance. Compact spans were less than 5 µm. Spread spans were 10 to less than 20 µm. The compact-minus-spread excess over independent rank placement was 0.117 percentage points. The 95% mouse bootstrap interval was −0.062 to 0.302 points. The two-sided mouse sign-flip p value was 0.240. An exact split gave 0.017 points from pair covariance terms and 0.100 points from a third central product. The third-product contrast was 0.048 points after removal of a field median signal, with an interval that included zero. A specified wider-span check gave a small positive result. It is secondary and uses a larger sample. The package provides a new triplet benchmark, all input arrays, source checks, code and figures. The test did not establish a compact-group advantage. These one-second calcium amplitudes do not identify spike synchrony, synaptic weights or a unique three-input mechanism.
dendritic spines · calcium imaging · trial ranks · joint activity · synaptic input · visual cortex · reproducible benchmark
References
7- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.19372968
We use version 1.0 of the spine calcium and position data.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115861
This study reports the source measurements and signal processing.
- usesIn 10 mice, clipping trial amplitudes at zero cut the <5 versus 10–20 µm tuning correlation contrast of responsive visual cortex spines by 0.085 in tests with odd and even repeats sci:sha256:fe21349f81db26fc0fed7410847f79826d047b45849490025a94aafa867af7e2
We reuse its signed compact inputs and its source extraction and retrieval code. We checked all compact files against a verified pull.
- usesIn 19 mice, spine pairs matched on two distances showed no clear branch difference in trial residual calcium correlation sci:sha256:1e68f513ef454c9288329748429609c623cfc4dbfd9852c59562b06991863a62
We reuse its source audit code and compare the new triplet question with its pair correlation test.
- In 19 mice, sums of two spine calcium signals gave no clear local advantage in a linear orientation test sci:sha256:da4e0418b4c7a5421d3ed0be32428f9c29e32f04fcb1051c035b6b320f74ef87
This prior work tested a linear sum of two spine signals. The present test measures joint high ranks in three signals.
- Adding a spine calcium signal 2–5 µm away decreased linear test error by 0.34% after field and distant signals in 19 mice sci:sha256:f30de1ef8da690238872fa8e1b6b02c71af9ba3b9ea5e7e699f584737a941478
This prior work tested local linear response completion. It gives context for the new coincidence test.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.016
This experiment shows why the spatial and temporal pattern of input matters for dendritic integration.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.