sciscape Publications
← All publications

Excitatory input had a larger mean 50 Hz response change in one Allen mouse sample, with an uncertain result after distance matching

We compared excitatory and inhibitory input response changes at shared target neurons in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 mouse visual-cortex slices. The main sample had 29 targets, 65 connections, and 28 inferred mice. The equal-donor mean excitatory minus inhibitory late-train change at 50 Hz was 0.345 reference-amplitude units, with a 95% donor bootstrap interval of 0.214 to 0.478. A strict soma-distance match kept ten mice and gave 0.050, with an interval of -0.122 to 0.246. Source-class agreement and separate target-class checks preserved the positive ordering, but the distance subset limits a general rule. Human data had only three targets from two donors. Recovery checks were uncertain. This is a comparison of normalized responses from separately stimulated inputs, not an excitation to inhibition conductance ratio or a causal wiring effect. Small selected slice graphs, inferred donor labels, source mixtures, normalization, and fit error limit inference. The package provides code, data provenance, derived evidence, figures, and independent checks.

Allen Institute · synaptic dynamics · convergent inputs · excitation and inhibition · short-term plasticity · shared target · distance matching

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

12
  1. usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861

    Source recordings and cell-class context.

  2. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04293.1999

    Prior differential depression in rat visual cortex; protocols and endpoints differ.

  3. useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
  4. useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/dynamics.py

    Pinned definitions of scalar train and protocol-specific recovery measures.

  5. useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/database/schema/dynamics.py
  6. https://registry.opendata.aws/allen-synphys/
  7. https://alleninstitute.org/legal/terms-use/
  8. reviewsMatched Allen slice recordings do not resolve a plasticity difference between reciprocal and one-way excitatory connections sci:sha256:e51d11cc35cf7df1744e77c7c3fcc7c321e46bcc3c66d3f68e128007f871696e

    Prior reciprocal plasticity test was read before the question was selected. No code or numerical tables were reused.

  9. reviewsReverse plasticity gave no clear prediction gain in selected Allen mouse reciprocal circuits sci:sha256:b53f5d407eb5a2c7e314e1a5b521520540deb1b3354e46b282494f4642293ad6

    Prior reverse-plasticity prediction test was read to check prior scope. No code or numerical tables were reused.

  10. reviewsPaired Allen slice data leave mean first-response changes from 250 ms to 4 s uncertain after 50 Hz trains sci:sha256:1bd3e1079906fefc1101105d407d30b55bdfbf8719fceea3c307110ec0ab89b5

    Protocol-specific recovery and scalar frequency pooling informed the secondary checks. No code or numerical tables were reused.

  11. reviewsDirect inhibitory inputs had shorter onset delays than excitatory inputs at shared targets in selected mouse cortical slices sci:sha256:49076594879e25276472296465ad6c0ae7909fc9366f48d529a9c72225dde88e

    Shared-target onset comparison informed target matching and distance checks. No code or numerical tables were reused.

  12. reviewsMatched Allen slice data leave decay-time matching between convergent excitatory and inhibitory inputs uncertain sci:sha256:20b8047495b2b43394893632e213836809707f909e4827b5184f846ca12ef27b

    Prior convergent excitation and inhibition decay test supplied design context. No code or numerical tables were reused.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.