Direct inhibitory inputs had shorter onset delays than excitatory inputs at shared targets in selected mouse cortical slices
We compared direct excitatory and inhibitory input delays at the same recorded target cell in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1. We used detected connections with a passed response fit and cell-body distance at most 500 micrometres. In mouse visual cortex, 74 targets from 64 inferred animals gave a mean inhibitory minus excitatory onset delay of -0.585 ms. Its nominal 97.5% donor bootstrap interval was -0.836 to -0.351 ms. A check that kept input pairs with distance differences at most 25 micrometres gave -0.321 ms in 29 animals, with an interval of -0.576 to -0.051 ms. Human temporal cortex had 11 targets from seven inferred donors. Its estimate was 1.034 ms, with an interval of -0.167 to 2.296 ms. The human result remains uncertain. This is a comparison of direct inputs from separately stimulated sources. It does not measure a feedforward inhibitory relay or response jitter. Sparse slice samples, source cell composition, fitted onset values, and inferred donor labels limit the result.
Allen Institute · synaptic delay · shared target · excitation · inhibition · cortical slices
References
8- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
Source study of local cortical connectivity and synaptic physiology.
- doi:10.1126/science.1061692
A feedforward inhibitory relay can constrain integration time. The present direct-input contrast does not measure that relay.
- useshttps://registry.opendata.aws/allen-synphys/
- useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
- https://github.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/blob/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/database/schema/synapse.py
- https://github.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/blob/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/pipeline/multipatch/synapse.py
- usesCell-body distance improves donor-held-out latency predictions for mouse inhibitory connections in Allen brain-slice data sci:sha256:2405b942827aa469febd8caff7e828eeb4896a36c1f112aa2356a799dfebcf99
Uses inferred donor naming and the local distance scope as design precedents. No code or data tables reused.
- reviewsMatched Allen slice data leave decay-time matching between convergent excitatory and inhibitory inputs uncertain sci:sha256:20b8047495b2b43394893632e213836809707f909e4827b5184f846ca12ef27b
Prior shared-target study tested decay-time matching. This work tests signed onset-delay differences without a disjoint-target comparator.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsStored start values fix 119 of 204 selected Allen input order comparisons under 0.1 ms half-width windows
Prior shared-target summary onset comparison; we use mode-specific fits and do not require a summary onset.
- usesMatched Allen slice connections leave the link between larger excitatory responses and shorter onset delays uncertain
Shared-target matching, donor parsing, and local-distance scope are design precedents. New code and endpoints are used.
- reviewsExcitatory input had a larger mean 50 Hz response change in one Allen mouse sample, with an uncertain result after distance matching
Shared-target onset comparison informed target matching and distance checks. No code or numerical tables were reused.
- usesDecay mismatch limited cancellation in exponential models of selected Allen cortical inputs
Direct onset comparison, local distance scope and inferred donor grouping precedents; no code or result tables reused.
- Passed fits preserve the delay order in three selected Allen inhibitory circuits, but do not give a current-clamp check of the positive relay budget