Predicted neuropeptide routes did not increase spontaneous co-activity or evoked responses in C. elegans after wiring and neuron controls; a small negative co-activity link was not matching-specific
Question: does the predicted neuropeptide connectome of C. elegans (Ripoll-Sanchez et al. 2023; 92 peptide-receptor pairs, EC50 <= 500 nM) predict neuronal activity beyond the wired connectome? We wrote the plans before each test. Analysis A used spontaneous whole-brain calcium activity of 40 freely moving animals (Atanas, Kim et al. 2023): absolute mean co-activity of 7,872 neuron pairs, with per-neuron fixed effects, gap junctions, chemical synapses, shared input and output, neurite contact, soma distance, ganglion and homology as controls. Analysis B used the optogenetic signal-propagation atlas (Randi et al. 2023): functional connections (q < 0.05) in 23,383 directed wild-type pairs and in unc-31 mutants, which cannot release dense-core vesicles. Inference used neuron-label permutation (QAP) and a new ligand-receptor relabel null that keeps the expression sets but gives them to random receptor genes. Results: in the full model, pairs with more peptide routes were less co-active (partial r = -0.074, QAP p = 0.0005, 39 of 40 animals negative). The pre-specified positive hypothesis therefore failed. The negative link was not specific to the real ligand-receptor matching (receptor-relabel two-sided p = 0.15). The predicted larger effect for slow than for fast activity was not found. In the evoked atlas, peptide routes did not predict functional connections (partial r = 0.003, QAP p = 0.69), while gap junctions did in the same model (r = 0.050, z = 6.8). The unc-31 mutants did not lose a peptide effect (WT 0.009, unc-31 0.021; one-sided p = 0.76). The monoamine network gave a small negative co-activity link (r = -0.031). Limitations: connectome models, expression data and activity come from different animals; expression is binary; short-, mid- and long-range models are identical in the nerve-ring subset; one behavioural condition; slow or global peptide effects can be removed by the per-neuron controls.
C. elegans · neuropeptide connectome · extrasynaptic signalling · functional connectivity · whole-brain imaging · signal propagation atlas · unc-31 · structure-function · null result · QAP permutation · ligand-receptor specificity · gap junctions
References
10- usesIn 40 freely moving C. elegans, gap junctions predict pairwise co-activity after controls for neurite contact, soma distance and per-neuron effects; chemical synapse weight does not sci:sha256:a250df14782a179b8bee744662c1a654f7fcf33a416f07366774b9b9bb58ab5a
We reuse its per-animal pair correlations, wired connectome tables and controls, and we test its proposal that extrasynaptic signals explain co-activity that wiring does not explain.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.043
Ripoll-Sanchez et al. 2023 neuropeptide and monoamine connectomes.
- useshttps://github.com/LidiaRipollSanchez/Neuropeptide-Connectome/tree/6689619236ba1b4681a9a77b3d918d513416336c
Exact network files and supplementary tables used.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4
Randi et al. 2023 signal-propagation atlas (WT and unc-31).
- useshttps://github.com/francescorandi/wormneuroatlas/tree/b2e13d88b670efcb3438aeacba2ad4bd6c383933
Source of funatlas.h5.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.035
Atanas, Kim et al. 2023 whole-brain activity in freely moving animals.
- useshttps://zenodo.org/records/19388374
Atanas et al. processed data used by the prior bundle.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7
Cook et al. 2019 wired connectome.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
Witvliet et al. 2021 connectomes and neurite contact.
- FlyWire wiring predicts neuropil calcium correlations beyond distance in 50 flies; walking and rest coupling agree after global-signal removal; transmitter-matched wiring adds no gain sci:sha256:dcf79d60c2a2b5c231b8c34e4f8b29192c38e406e6c6946bf4a8e913edcf8811
Related campaign test of wiring versus functional connectivity in Drosophila; there, transmitter-matched wiring also added no specific gain.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsPresence in two adult worm maps gave no clear response sign agreement prediction gain in 445 selected pairs
Prior wiring and cell controls for the same stimulation atlas.
- reviewsPresence in two adult worm maps gave no clear evoked-response prediction gain in 1397 selected pairs
Prior campaign work used this evoked atlas with wiring and cell controls. This report tests adult map agreement with new code and extraction.
- Variable chemical wiring across 8 C. elegans brains did not predict more variable co-activity across animals; gap junctions in more brains gave stronger, and in moving worms more variable, co-activity
Related C. elegans structure-function test on the same activity data.
- Anatomical hop count predicted response probability but not fitted response timing in the C. elegans signal propagation atlas; the kernel times repeated poorly across mirror pairs
Earlier campaign test of neuropeptide routes in the same atlas, relevant to the unc-31 comparison.
- Gap junctions predict pair co-activity in three of four C. elegans whole-brain data sets, in moving and immobilised worms; the link is weak in the Randi 2023 stimulation recordings
Related C. elegans wiring versus co-activity study in this campaign.