With stable means and independent repeat errors, mean finger response area was positive in five ECoG patients and six fMRI adults after feature mean removal
We tested whether five finger cues give repeatable spatial response area in separate public human ECoG and fMRI studies. Two patients and one MRI adult supplied development. A local code lock preceded reserved scores. The fixed count rule retained five patients and six MRI adults. Four separate repeat groups supplied an area crossproduct; separate calibration data set its positive scale. Under stable within-half expected responses and independent repeat errors, one measured response axis gives zero expected area. After feature mean removal, five-finger means were 0.021117 and 0.001977. Their pointwise 95% person Student intervals were [0.002085,0.040150] and [0.001179,0.002776]. All 11 scores were positive. The fixed shared mean test passed two-claim Holm correction, p=0.036908. The thumb-omission test failed, p=0.079099. ECoG intervals also crossed zero when feature means were kept or repeat groups were contiguous. A sign-only two-claim decision would fail. Thus the positive finding depends on the stated mean model and processing. An explicit-minor audit matched all 22 primary scores within 8.54e-18. Exact examples gave positive area with shared errors, changing rank-one means, or nonlinear measurement of one latent scalar. No latent rank, matching neural axes, common mechanism or causality was established. The contribution is a conditional finger benchmark and a checked compact assay. Code, all outcomes, source pins and terms, local plans, figures, audits and repeat steps are supplied. Neural arrays remain external.
finger responses · ECoG · fMRI · representational geometry · independent repeats · rank · measurement error
References
10- usesFixed tests did not confirm four-axis finger gains in four ECoG patients and six fMRI adults sci:sha256:c7e2ab2de928e8ff187bbffb8ce92b6eb048152e30c642d36a4a8f65a3f86f64
We reuse its public source pins, fetch code and high-frequency finger feature reader. Its prediction-rank limit motivates this area test.
- usesA fixed test did not confirm shared finger pair structure in five ECoG patients and seven fMRI adults sci:sha256:d22893af7b32a68f335d0ab3987472b958c2c0f3e092f4ead3cb8847692089c4
It supplied upstream source access and trial-boundary code and a prior finger-distance benchmark.
- usesWith fixed condition means and independent repeat errors, tests supported two residual motor map directions in 15 ECoG patients and 58 fMRI adults sci:sha256:5ea1d1898292b0d226c9f9e0fe8910c781083141d2ca3e5d4dfb2c1b65548fee
It already applied the four-repeat determinant principle to whole-hand and tongue maps. We test individual fingers and a fixed thumb omission.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002655
- doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0678-3
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.062
- doi:10.1038/nn.4038
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.051
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.26560
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTests did not confirm shared visual repetition bounds in three EEG, 15 MEG and 18 fMRI records from two studies
Four-repeat area principle and limits; no source code copied.
- usesA fixed test did not confirm greater thumb contrast energy in two ECoG patients and six fMRI adults
We reuse its public source pins, fetch code and window-local electrical feature reader. Its nonthumb area failure motivated the present contrast test.
- Nine states of one scalar reproduced eight-site sound means in separate human SEEG and fMRI studies
Prior finite-repeat area benchmark and deterministic nonlinear measurement limit.