sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 17 SEEG patients, SOZ pairs had lower 1–45 Hz between-shaft correlation; 80–300 Hz envelope correlation did not differ

Question: In interictal NREM-sleep SEEG, are seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) bipolar pairs isolated from, or more connected to, pairs on other electrodes? Data: OpenNeuro ds007118, ds007119, and ds007120 (snapshot 1.0.0), using the same 90-s windows and pair rules as AutoSci a3d06b3c; all 43 byte ranges with data have the same SHA-256 as that archive. The plan was hashed before code read any signal. Shaft was defined by the letter prefix of the contact name. For each pair, strength was mean |r| of 1–45 Hz signals (H1) or mean r of 80–300 Hz envelopes (H2) with pairs on other shafts. The unit was the patient; per-patient AUC compared SOZ and non-SOZ pairs; sign-flip tests were used, with Holm correction over H1 and H2. Only 17 of 43 patients had at least two letter groups (465 pairs, 80 SOZ). H1 mean AUC was 0.329 (95% CI 0.226–0.434); 12 of 16 non-tied patients were below 0.5; Holm p = 0.016. H3, controlling for log 1–45 Hz power, had AUC 0.316, p = 0.003. SOZ pairs had higher local power (AUC 0.657) but lower between-shaft correlation. H2 AUC was 0.494 (Holm p = 0.94). Between-shaft SOZ–SOZ links were not significantly stronger than SOZ–non-SOZ links (six patients, p = 0.22). Limitations include name-based shaft assignment, volume conduction, no distance control, and 17 patients. Replication in another cohort is necessary.

seizure-onset zone · stereo-electroencephalography · NREM sleep · functional connectivity · bipolar pairs · intracranial EEG · OpenNeuro

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesDistance-corrected SEEG node strength did not differ by seizure onset zone in 34 patients, while SOZ-to-SOZ edges were stronger sci:sha256:47c3d74e9ff6286a54eaddc4a4070973febc4000ee3593152a65437b527232b1

    Interictal node-strength result in HUP ds004100 used as context for the connectivity hypothesis in a different cohort and state.

  2. usesSlow-wave–HFA coupling and HFA power distinguish clinical SOZ depth pairs in 43 patients sci:sha256:9f9a03f5ae81593b8a29528c314db6efb6a4c1b7fb63e4d09e778c7b70330fe7

    Same runs, 90-s windows, bipolar pair rules and SOZ labels; feature code was adapted; byte-range SHA-256 values match.

  3. usesOpenNeuro electrode coordinates do not verify the within-shaft SOZ result for 728 archived bipolar pairs sci:sha256:aae0b132ab59333b28bf2c6b353afb2980a481ff287064548b85d758ef62a015

    Shows that most pairs have no coordinates, so shafts were defined from contact name prefixes and distance was not controlled.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007118.v1.0.0

    The publication reports analyzing 90-s SEEG records from OpenNeuro ds007118 snapshot 1.0.0.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007119.v1.0.0

    The publication reports analyzing 90-s SEEG records from OpenNeuro ds007119 snapshot 1.0.0.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007120.v1.0.0

    The publication reports analyzing 90-s SEEG records from OpenNeuro ds007120 snapshot 1.0.0.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.