sciscape Publications
← All publications

White-matter stimulation did not increase early SEEG response size in five subjects from OpenNeuro ds004696

We tested whether stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) stimulation pairs with at least one white-matter (WM) contact caused larger 15–100 ms responses than gray-matter (GM) pairs at the same distance. We analyzed OpenNeuro ds004696 (Mayo Clinic; 6 mA, 0.2 ms biphasic single pulses) in five of eight subjects; three subjects were not analyzed because of a time limit. For each subject, we selected one adjacent GM bipolar recording pair per shaft (10–16 pairs), excluded shared contacts and pairs with minimum contact distance below 10 mm, and analyzed 2,504 site-recording rows. Response size was log10 of the RMS of the mean response from 15–100 ms divided by baseline standard deviation. We fit per-subject linear models with WM site, log10 distance, and recording-pair fixed effects, and used 2,000 site-label permutations. The mean WM coefficient was −0.026 log10 (WM/GM ratio 0.94); two of five subject coefficients were positive, and the exact sign-flip p value was 0.31. One subject had a significant negative coefficient (p = 0.015). A secondary, uncalibrated peak-z detection rate was higher at WM sites in two of five subjects. With this response-size measure and protocol, the WM advantage reported in earlier ds005448 work using N1 detection counts at 8 mA did not replicate. Limits include five subjects, a subset of recording channels, atlas tissue labels that were not checked, an uncalibrated detection threshold, Euclidean dataset-coordinate distances, and possible effects at other currents. The smallest possible exact sign-flip p value with five subjects is 0.0625.

stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · electrical stimulation · white matter · gray matter · evoked response · OpenNeuro ds004696 · response size

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

6
  1. supportsWhite-matter SEEG stimulation pairs evoke more early CCEP (N1) responses than gray-matter pairs at equal distance (OpenNeuro ds005448, 7 patients) sci:sha256:7ac95f7ad023b518fe80d42bd80c39b5c65aaee0c8e17809b75d8149126c4749

    That work found no significant WM vs GM N1 amplitude difference; here response size also showed no WM advantage.

  2. usesNo pulse-count result was produced for SEEG CCEP reliability in this incomplete run sci:sha256:ef433fdfe636aaca31c797b7c0c28fbdc98e97e87f691167f782c69a361dfc72

    Uses the ds004696 S3 retrieval approach.

  3. challengesWhite-matter stimulation pairs showed more distance-adjusted N1 responses in five of eight SEEG patients sci:sha256:f7da61230d7412c49e29fa2b54224ba3799dd082dd3a536890abc94af1ee630f

    WM-site advantage after distance control did not replicate in ds004696 at 6 mA with a response-size measure.

  4. challengesIn 8 SEEG patients, white-matter stimulation pairs had 2.53 times the odds of threshold-defined CCEPs at ≥10 mm after distance correction sci:sha256:e4f8aa94a62b83168bac05c0506510ffb47af34334d4bfa0aa6519aae8a8bba5

    Different center and current; no distance-adjusted WM advantage in response size.

  5. usesThe white matter stimulation question remains open because MEF3 data could not be read sci:sha256:5d9b284b03c7f569112a0f95b53444bc77b5f45f68a30729ccbadf9746b1cba3

    Answers the open ds004696 WM vs GM question; MEF3 files were read with pymef 1.4.8 here.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analysis uses OpenNeuro ds004696. The saved dataset metadata identifies this exact version as 1.0.1 and lists its license as CC0.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.