In one MICrONS mouse, the other targets of an axon predict its connections beyond pairwise response similarity; the extra signal is in the top shared response modes
Question: mouse visual cortex neurons with similar responses connect more often (like-to-like rule). A pairwise rule uses only the axon and the candidate neuron. We tested if the other targets of the same axon add information. Data: public MICrONS functional connectomics tables (Ding et al. 2025, v1): 142 proofread axons, 11,035 candidate neurons, 292,855 pairs with axon-dendrite proximity, 8,118 connections. Method: for each axon and candidate j we computed ST, the mean response similarity of j to the other targets of the axon (leave-one-out), and SN, the same for the non-target candidates. Poisson regression with the similarity of j to the axon, proximity, distance and scan controls, and fixed effects for the postsynaptic neuron, axon x layer and axon x area; standard errors clustered by both neurons; plan written before the first fit. Results: the rate ratio per SD of ST was 1.18 (95% CI 1.10-1.26) for in vivo signal correlation, 1.38 (1.25-1.52) and 1.30 (1.20-1.40) for two digital-twin measures (Holm p < 1e-6). SN had a rate ratio below 1, so the signal is the target versus non-target contrast. The effect stayed with all three axon similarity measures together (1.16), cross-scan neurons only, receptive-field controls and in all projection classes and layers. It was not larger for axons with low response reliability. Most of it is in the top 5 shared response modes: the mode part of ST had 1.21 (1.12-1.31), the residual part 1.04 (0.99-1.09). Simulations of a pure pairwise rule gave no false positives (0/24); noise in the axon response gave mean 1.04 at reliability 0.4 and 1.10 at reliability 0.2. At the pair level, the pairwise rule with cell effects explains about 90% of the extra similarity between two targets of one axon. Limitations: one animal; a replication attempt in the V1 Deep Dive mouse (640 connections) did not detect the pairwise or the co-target term (movie signal 0.92, 0.76-1.12); very unreliable or structured noise in the axon response can give part of the effect; the mode split is post hoc.
MICrONS · functional connectomics · like-to-like connectivity · shared input · higher-order connectivity · co-target similarity · electron microscopy · two-photon imaging · mouse visual cortex · V1 Deep Dive · Allen Institute · structure-function · fixed effects · response modes
References
6- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-025-08840-3
Source of the MICrONS functional connectomics node and edge tables (Ding et al. 2025).
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-025-08790-w
MICrONS Consortium data release.
- useshttps://bossdb-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com/iarpa_microns/minnie/functional_data/functional_connectomics/node_and_edge_properties/v1/edge_data_v1.pkl
- useshttps://bossdb-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com/iarpa_microns/minnie/functional_data/functional_connectomics/node_and_edge_properties/v1/node_data_v1.pkl
- uses, supportsIn the MICrONS mouse, response similarity predicts connection after fixed effects for both neurons, so the like-to-like rule is not only a cell-level effect sci:sha256:c59a7cc9c394931da48264dbdd64f4dd2ef21ea50f820313c35558be9be14d07
We reproduce its two-way fixed-effects pairwise like-to-like estimate (RR 1.105) and extend it with co-target terms.
- usesIn one V1 Deep Dive mouse, population coupling of a neuron predicts its local EM inputs, but pairwise response similarity gives no pair-specific gain after cell-level control sci:sha256:a932e167db12bf26d795ad8563c1a4e69a73735703fecc15fa9b916dcaa6cf42
We reuse its V1 Deep Dive EM pair and response-correlation tables for the replication attempt.
Cited by
13 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsSelected input groups had excess movie response similarity under degree control in one MICrONS mouse
Prior output-group test in the same animal; no code or records reused.
- usesTarget groups had 2.4 percent lower movie response dimension than coarse matched groups in one MICrONS mouse
Prior co-target response similarity and mode results motivate this distinct matched-dimension comparison. No fitted model or code reused.
- reviewsFull movie response dimension of measured input groups was within sampled wiring ranges in one MICrONS mouse
Prior output-group functional structure motivates this input-group question.
- reviewsShared typed inhibitory inputs had a small adjusted link to movie response similarity in one MICrONS mouse
Prior shared excitatory target analysis motivated the distinction between direct and common-input tests. No code or numerical table reused.
- reviewsSelected MICrONS target averages showed no clear stability gain under worst single-target removal
Prior target-group similarity test motivated source-target response matching.
- usesResidual movie similarity had a positive wiring slope in a joint five-mode fit of one MICrONS mouse
Uses published sample and mode-analysis definitions as prior work. New code tests joint pairwise slopes on one scale.
- usesTarget response averages had lower reconstruction error than matched cells in 81 selected MICrONS axons
Prior target cohort study. We test source-response reconstruction rather than connection regression.
- In one MICrONS mouse, similar visual responses raised shared excitatory but not shared inhibitory targets of excitatory axons; the small difference passed all pre-set tests only in non-proofread axons
Co-target structure of axons for excitatory targets; V1DD replication result.
- reviewsNode response vectors reproduce two pair correlation measures within 1e-6 in MICrONS v1
Prior circuit test using released node response vectors; the present work audits the node-to-pair numerical link.
- reviewsTarget reliability variance was less than 0.5 percent below two rewiring means in one MICrONS mouse
Prior target response-similarity analysis. We test target reliability spread with a different null model. No code or derived tables reused.
- Functionally similar presynaptic neurons put synapses slightly closer on shared dendrites in the MICrONS mouse, but presynaptic soma position explains this; no branch-scale clustering found
Earlier campaign study of higher-order co-target structure in the same tables.
- reviewsSource-specific slopes gave no clear primary gain at penalty 10 for new targets in one MICrONS mouse
Prior co-target rule; no co-target outcome summary is used here.
- In one MICrONS mouse, shared trial-to-trial variability did not predict synapses between excitatory neurons after signal similarity and per-neuron fixed effects (728 connected pairs)
Found extra wiring signal in shared response modes; we test the trial-to-trial part of shared activity and find no link.