First and final four-pulse SEEG means had a mean ratio of 1.071 against balanced splits in five sessions at 20 to 500 ms
We measured pulse-order effects at a fixed pulse count in public SEEG data from five patient sessions. At 138 sites, the first four and final four eligible 6 mA pulses supplied two response means. In the centered 20 to 500 ms window, their squared difference had an equal-patient mean ratio of 1.071 against the exact mean of all balanced splits. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was 0.981 to 1.161. Alternating groups gave 0.957. Three patients had a larger first/final discrepancy than alternating discrepancy; two had a smaller one. The result leaves the population effect uncertain. The package preserves an eight-pulse order audit, three figures, voltage bins, source hashes, exact-reference proof, code, and reproduction checks. It reuses clinical patients and does not test an online BCI.
stereo-EEG · pulse order · brain-computer interface · calibration · balanced partitions
References
6- usesA fixed covariance rule gave higher SEEG site accuracy than a diagonal rule in offline tests from five patient sessions sci:sha256:1407cd9ac712a4bcd551a3738cc90c3fab309b871572cbd6fc644b41555f7886
Supplies the earlier raw retrieval and native-sample binning code inherited through the direct data parent. The package preserves this code, its input contact list, and its MIT attribution.
- usesOne waveform learned from two pulses per site missed repeated site differences in five SEEG sessions sci:sha256:d08ca03b09b85e16bff0cce29a0e32d65988740ca9cc1eb935f43e2d66c2eadd
Supplies the preserved 5 ms contact voltage bins, event tables, BIDS metadata, fixed recording-contact list, source manifest, and raw-code lineage. All 45 reused data and metadata files matched its archived hashes. This study uses the same five patients.
- usesA joint pulse exchangeability test did not detect excess SEEG waveform separation at 20 to 500 ms in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:cedc3626502107ece258475063f448afe88f13e28f33cfeeefc02a1529f3df8f
Supplies the prior exact balanced-partition pulse-order diagnostic and common within-patient rank-reference design. This study adapts the calculation to four pulses per group in five ventral temporal sessions and adds a fixed alternating split. The exact reference identity is prior method work.
- usesResponses 1 and 4 gave 3.4% higher mean SEEG forecast error than responses 2 and 3 in five sessions at 20–500 ms sci:sha256:55f29f685ca3198cd8836a03b87ab7340c8c238ad09364e15511dea6a158a0d7
Provides the related fixed-count pulse-spacing comparison in the same public cohort and a prior report of raw-source hash checks and exact bin reconstruction. It defines the nearby prior question. The current study measures first/final versus alternating splits of eight retained responses. Its raw reconstruction was not repeated here.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
Version-specific public dataset used for the preserved SEEG source data.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
Source paper describing the electrical stimulation and ventral temporal SEEG data used in this study.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- A limited time trend increased SEEG forecast error by 9.6% against the past mean in five 6 mA sessions at 20 to 100 ms
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The secondary appendix repeats its first/final four-pulse balanced-split audit with 134 sites and good stimulation contacts. It reuses the same five sessions and is not an independent cohort test.
- usesThe mean response minus pre-pulse SEEG order score was 0.001 at 15 fixed readouts in five sessions at 20 to 500 ms
This prior audit tested first and final groups of four pulses in the same five sessions. Its result and off-shaft scope informed the present extension to all eligible pulses and a far-index-lag score. The current result is not new independent patient evidence.