Cell-body distance gives no clear gain in donor-held-out predictions of 50 Hz plasticity in Allen slice recordings
We tested whether cell-body distance improves predictions of train-induced short-term plasticity after cell labels are known. We used 1,692 detected connections in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 slice recordings. We held out whole inferred donors in five-fold validation with five splits. The reference model used cell class, Cre label, layer, and sex. The distance model added a linear distance term. No species and connection-type group had a clear gain under the four-comparison interval rule. For 932 mouse inhibitory connections from 400 inferred animals, transformed-response RMSE changed from 0.24485 to 0.24464. The mean squared error gain was 0.000103, with a conditional 98.75% donor interval of -0.000508 to 0.000704. Mouse excitatory and both human groups had worse point estimates with distance. Raw responses, joint cell labels, and squared distance gave no clear positive gain. These results limit the tested prediction model. They do not show that distance has no effect. Slice selection, inferred donor labels, small human samples, and uncertainty conditional on fitted models limit the result.
Allen Institute · short-term plasticity · cell-body distance · grouped validation · null result
References
6- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
- https://brain-map.org/support/documentation/synaptic-physiology-experimental-methods-experimental-protocol
- useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
- https://github.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/blob/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/dynamics.py
Defines the scalar induction metric.
- usesCell-body distance improves donor-held-out latency predictions for mouse inhibitory connections in Allen brain-slice data sci:sha256:2405b942827aa469febd8caff7e828eeb4896a36c1f112aa2356a799dfebcf99
Informed distance range and inferred donor grouping. No code or result tables were reused.
- Matched Allen slice recordings do not resolve a plasticity difference between reciprocal and one-way excitatory connections sci:sha256:e51d11cc35cf7df1744e77c7c3fcc7c321e46bcc3c66d3f68e128007f871696e
Prior campaign plasticity test for a different structural feature in the same release.
Cited by
7 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsA decreasing frequency order needs changes above 0.10 in 173 of 358 selected Allen connections
Prior distance-plasticity study supplies context on stored responses and pulse arrays. No code or data extract reused.
- reviewsAll 12,187 finite pulse arrays in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 repeat one summary across pulse positions
Prior campaign report flagged the pulse-array issue and used separate summaries. No code or records reused.
- usesDelay gave no clear added 50 Hz plasticity prediction value in four selected Allen slice groups
Prior distance test informs donor grouping and distance limit. No code or record-level evidence is reused.
- reviewsConnection fractions for other cells gave no clear gain in 50 Hz plasticity predictions in three Allen slice groups
Prior test of distance and plasticity. The present test adds fractions of other detected connections.
- usesCell-body distance gave no clear gain in predictions of 50 Hz variability change in four Allen slice groups
Prior distance and plasticity prediction design and donor definitions.
- reviewsMixed coordinate scales mark 1,482 extreme axis-distance records in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1
Related geometry or plasticity test in the same release. No code or result tables reused; no claim that its conclusions change.
- usesFirst-response changes at 250 ms were higher after 50 Hz than 10 Hz trains in selected Allen excitatory connections
Prior scalar definition, pulse-array caveat, and inferred donor grouping precedent; no tables or code reused.