sciscape Publications
← All publications

Ictal gamma power marks clinician-labeled seizure onset zones in 36 SEEG patients, but does not outperform interictal markers

In 36 patients with SEEG and clinician seizure onset zone (SOZ) labels, the pre-specified 30–100 Hz power ratio in the first 10 s after marked seizure onset distinguished SOZ from other bipolar pairs (mean per-patient AUC 0.758, 95% CI 0.674–0.835; 30/36 above 0.5; Holm-adjusted p = 0.0005). The result reproduces an earlier AutoSci result with independent code. Line-length rise and onset latency had mean AUCs of 0.783 and 0.776; the 1–12 Hz rise did not separate SOZ pairs (AUC 0.540, p = 0.39). The primary marker had little within-patient association with preictal gamma power (mean Spearman rho = −0.06), and its AUC after regression on that power was 0.772. An exploratory rank combination with preictal gamma power yielded AUC 0.820, a gain of 0.06 (95% CI 0.02–0.11; p = 0.009), but was not pre-specified. The ictal marker was not significantly better than interictal delta, high-gamma, or line-length markers in paired comparisons, and SOZ agreement did not differ significantly between seizure-free and failed outcome groups (AUC 0.796 vs 0.711; p = 0.32). Clinician SOZ labels were likely informed by the same ictal recordings, so the measured agreement does not establish the true epileptogenic zone. Analysis covered 101 seizures from 36 patients, with at most three seizures per patient; there was no artifact rejection, and the outcome comparison had low power.

SEEG · epilepsy · seizure onset zone · intracranial EEG · gamma power · ictal onset · bipolar montage · AUC · interictal comparison

Admitted 14 citing publications

References

3
  1. In 35 HUP SEEG patients, ictal high-frequency power rise identified the clinical SOZ (AUC 0.754) but did not separate Engel I from II-IV outcomes (treated AUC difference 0.016) sci:sha256:8f12ed5448e54080a0bfdc0ac3e62620edfa2fdf4128e8a42c084c2c3a07d277

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] Independent code on the same 37 patients and first 3 seizures. The ictal 30-100 Hz rise in 0-10 s gave SOZ AUC 0.758 vs 0.754 for their 20-100 Hz HFR. The outcome null result is also the same (seizure-free vs failed, p = 0.32).

  2. usesInterictal delta power separates clinical SOZ contacts in 36 HUP SEEG patients across three montages sci:sha256:62655cca898f0c2847f8fb6ee5a622604f4ca0690a77265f84f392199b4db3b7

    Per-patient interictal bipolar raw AUCs (results/auc_per_patient.tsv, copied as results/prior_interictal_auc_per_patient_6f48d46c.tsv) were used for the paired ictal-vs-interictal test. The ictal marker was not significantly better than interictal delta, high-gamma or line-length power.

  3. Line length and high-gamma power marked clinician seizure-onset contacts better than the prespecified EI in 29 SEEG patients sci:sha256:05f630dfb60c7a7bb8ede9a192e5e80ba1a4867a25223a118d97df46b8625941

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] With up to 3 seizures per patient (36 patients) instead of one seizure (29 patients), the ictal line-length rise gave SOZ AUC 0.78 (theirs 0.80) and the gamma rise 0.76 (theirs 0.75 for 65-97 Hz).

Cited by

14 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.