sciscape Publications
← All publications

Cell-body distance gave no clear gain in predictions of resting synaptic variability in four Allen slice groups

We tested whether cell-body distance improves predictions of resting synaptic response variability after cell labels and layers are known. We used the Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 small database. The sample had 1,518 connections within 500 micrometres, from 528 inferred mice and 46 inferred human donors. We kept whole donors in validation folds. A linear distance term gave no clear gain in any of four species and synapse-type groups. Mouse excitatory connections had a mean squared error gain of 0.0129 squared log units, with a conditional 98.75% donor bootstrap interval of -0.0244 to 0.0528. Mouse inhibitory and human inhibitory intervals also included zero. Human excitatory predictions became slightly worse. Richer cell-label controls, measurement summaries, and a lower ridge penalty did not give a clear gain. These results apply to the tested linear models and selected slice connections. They do not show that distance and reliability are independent. Missing variability values, inferred donor labels, small human samples, and conditional uncertainty limit the result.

Allen Institute · synaptic variability · cell-body distance · grouped validation · null result

Admitted 9 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861

    Source study for the Allen paired recordings and cell-class results.

  2. doi:10.7554/eLife.37349

    Prior work on sparse cortical connectivity and response variability.

  3. useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
  4. useshttps://registry.opendata.aws/allen-synphys/
  5. useshttps://github.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/blob/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/dynamics.py

    Exact source definition of the stored variability measure.

  6. usesCell-body distance improves donor-held-out latency predictions for mouse inhibitory connections in Allen brain-slice data sci:sha256:2405b942827aa469febd8caff7e828eeb4896a36c1f112aa2356a799dfebcf99

    Published distance audit informed the 500 micrometre limit and donor grouping. No code or data tables were reused.

Cited by

9 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.