The nearest half of SEEG pairs had a higher mean rate of repeatable waveforms across recorded contact order reversal in eight STReEF patients

1. The nearest half of bipolar SEEG pairs outside the stimulated shaft had a higher mean rate of repeatable responses than the random expectation in eight epilepsy sessions sci:sha256:1a26d36b188a95ead0d43f052fc29b919849315f46a2562310a4fc08e2efdae2

   [Legacy relation: reproduces] We tested its fixed nearest-half distance rule, signed correlation threshold, and time window in a separate public SEEG cohort. The pulse protocol and eligibility pool differ. The test is an external rule replication, not an identical protocol replication.

2. usesFixed donor variance weights raised mean SEEG pulse AUC with 16 temporal modes after five fit pulses in eight people from a separate cohort sci:sha256:eb64e4c0897c7de27a4559ea3c4fda4df040535bc6dffae1b4b414a65db978bf

   We reused its checksum-verified metadata sample, pinned source receipts, row maps, audit traces, and MIT retrieval helpers. We freshly retrieved every pulse range and added four-window full-rate waveform products and distance selection results.

3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0

   The analysis used STReEF, OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0, as its source dataset.

4. supportsdoi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274

   This source paper describes the clinical dataset and electrode coordinates.

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

• usesTwo calibration pulses gave lower mean four-condition accuracy than five at four SEEG pairs in eight STReEF patients after recorded contact order reversal

  We reused its metadata-only condition selection and pinned-source retrieval helpers through the feature-source package. Metadata replay reproduces the first four selected conditions in each of eight SEEG patients.

• usesSelection for distinct response patterns had an uncertain mean accuracy gain at four SEEG pairs in eight STReEF patients

  We used its fixed STReEF metadata sample, source metadata, object version pins, byte range receipts, and MIT retrieval code. We selected its first four conditions per patient. We recovered the voltage again and computed new features, selection rules, and test results.

• usesSelection for one known contact loss gave lower mean minimum site accuracy in eight offline SEEG tests with four disjoint pairs at 20–100 ms

  The retained source metadata plan and range-fetch code came from this publication through the direct feature source. Its pinned metadata and older raw range receipts enabled fresh source checks and sample replay. The new result tests site decoding after input omission; it does not repeat its distance analysis.

• usesOmitting lost inputs raised mean stimulation condition accuracy by 4.8 points in eight offline SEEG tests with known simulated contact loss

  Its metadata plan and source retrieval work are retained through the immediate feature source. We replayed the metadata plan for the first four conditions per patient. The package preserves its code lineage and source credit.

• usesAbsolute distance had no clear mean AUC gain over the label gap for absent conditions at four SEEG pairs in an offline test of eight patients

  Uses the source selection rule and pinned raw retrieval helpers that came through the direct parent. They provide the eight-patient SEEG source sample and its data provenance.

• usesFive-pulse products raised mean log loss in eight SEEG patients versus geometric means after recorded contact order reversal

  The source metadata selection and pinned public object recipes trace to this work. The present package preserves its source chain and replays the 32-condition selection.

• usesSelection for distinct response patterns had an uncertain mean accuracy gain at four SEEG pairs in eight STReEF patients

  We used its fixed STReEF metadata sample, source metadata, object version pins, byte range receipts, and MIT retrieval code. We selected its first four conditions per patient. We recovered the voltage again and computed new features, selection rules, and test results.

• usesCalibrated Student t scores gave no observed mean loss gain in eight SEEG patients after contact order reversal with four recording pairs

  We used the inherited source metadata selection and public source retrieval recipes. The package preserves the pinned metadata and a replay that matches the 32 selected conditions.

• usesDisjoint SEEG pairs gave 53.1% mean minimum four-site accuracy, compared with 53.8%, in eight STReEF patients. Tests used four pairs, 20–100 ms features, and up to one known simulated contact loss.

  We reused the metadata-only selection and source range retrieval helpers carried by the direct parent. They enabled reconstruction of the same version-pinned public epochs.

• usesOne component reduced mean 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error in eight STReEF patients with five fit pulses

  This study uses the fixed sample, metadata, source receipts, MIT helpers, and audit voltages. It adds fresh spatial map products and forecast tests.

• usesGlobal amplitude removal lowered mean site accuracy after recorded contact order reversal in eight STReEF patients with four SEEG pairs

  We used its metadata selection and pinned retrieval helpers through the direct parent publication. These helpers selected the fixed sample and enabled the raw-data rebuild. We retained their license notice.

• usesGreater distance was associated with a smaller early window advantage in repeatable SEEG voltage at 96 conditions in eight patients

  This study uses its fixed SEEG sample, four-window waveform products, source metadata, licenses, and raw retrieval code. It adds matched control products and tests distance against the early and late repeatable waveform fraction.

• usesDistance from supplied coordinates showed no clear mean link to 25–95 ms voltage peak time after a five-pulse R ≥ 0.5 screen in 8 SEEG records

  Its metadata selector and checked HTTP range download code are retained through the direct input publication. We reproduced the chosen events and contact pairs from source metadata and kept its MIT notice.

• usesA four-pair SEEG reader kept 73.1% four-site accuracy under 16 ideal recording sign patterns in eight patients

  We used its metadata selection and pinned retrieval helpers through the direct input publication. These helpers replayed sample selection and retrieved source metadata and raw ranges. We kept the code license notices.

• usesA four-pair SEEG reader kept 73.1% four-site accuracy under 16 ideal recording sign patterns in eight patients

  We used its metadata selection and pinned retrieval helpers through the direct input publication. These helpers replayed sample selection and retrieved source metadata and raw ranges. We kept the code license notices.

• usesFive late SEEG bins had lower mean accuracy than one window at equal value and pair counts in eight STReEF patients

  This study uses the metadata selection rule and source retrieval basis. The package preserves exact source ranges, versions, hashes, and the inherited implementation.

• usesA template search improved SEEG condition-label robustness across an imposed ±9.77 ms error grid in eight patients

  This work supplied the earlier metadata selection rule. We retained its first four conditions per patient through the immediate parent.

• usesTwo calibration pulses gave lower mean four-condition accuracy than five at four SEEG pairs in eight STReEF patients after recorded contact order reversal

  We reused its metadata-only condition selection and pinned-source retrieval helpers through the feature-source package. Metadata replay reproduces the first four selected conditions in each of eight SEEG patients.