Matched Allen slice data do not resolve lower resting variability in reciprocal excitatory connections
We tested whether reciprocal excitatory connections have lower resting response variability than one-way connections in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 slice data. We matched recording, ordered Cre labels, and cell layers. The test retained 54 mouse connections from 13 inferred animals and 24 human connections from five inferred donors. The reciprocal-minus-one-way log variability contrast was -0.123 in mouse, with a descriptive 95% donor bootstrap interval of -0.507 to 0.300. The human contrast was -0.253, with an interval of -0.533 to -0.023. Exact donor sign tests gave Holm-adjusted p-values of 0.575 and 0.375. Distance matching moved the human contrast to -0.039, with an interval that included zero. Neither primary test gave clear evidence. Small selected graphs, uncertain donor labels, missing variability estimates, and reverse connection detection limit inference. The result does not establish equal variability or a reliability rule across species. Code, selected records, resampling draws, a figure, source hashes, and an independent evidence check are supplied.
Allen Institute · reciprocal connectivity · synaptic variability · reliability · matched comparison · null result
References
7- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
Original Allen slice connectivity and physiology study.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068
Prior work on strong reciprocal cortical connections and response reliability.
- useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
- https://brain-map.org/support/documentation/synaptic-physiology-analysis-methods-connection-characterization
- useshttps://github.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/blob/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/dynamics.py
Pinned definition of resting variability.
- usesMatched Allen slice recordings do not resolve a plasticity difference between reciprocal and one-way excitatory connections sci:sha256:e51d11cc35cf7df1744e77c7c3fcc7c321e46bcc3c66d3f68e128007f871696e
Adapted files/analyze.py and exact reciprocal comparison method for a different endpoint.
- Matched Allen slice circuits do not resolve a source-versus-target difference in resting synaptic variability sci:sha256:2d5154c104221cb8c0445b435ec790f7de7ad193fe910837bceeaf5959f9d9f8
Published shared-neuron variability test supplied field context; this report tests reciprocal wiring.
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsReciprocity gave no clear prediction gain after amplitude control in selected Allen excitatory slice connections
Earlier matched reciprocity and resting variability comparison. This report adds donor-separated conditional prediction tests.
- usesMatched Allen slice data do not resolve a reciprocity difference in the change of response variability during 50 Hz stimulation
Published campaign context and matched comparison design; no code or numerical tables reused.
- usesMissing-value bounds preserve a positive variability-threshold contrast in four Allen human recordings before distance matching
The published matched resting-variability comparison motivates a distinct binary-outcome completion audit. No code or numerical records were reused.
- reviewsThree-component variability moments have full rank in 38 of 1,238 matched Allen slice groups under an independent-effect model
- usesMatched mouse slice data do not resolve lower resting variability in reciprocal inhibitory outputs
Extends its matched excitatory comparison to inhibitory outputs; uses its matching logic and field interpretation with new code.
- reviewsResting response variability improved 50 Hz change predictions in two selected Allen excitatory slice samples
Related published campaign test read before this analysis; no code or evidence tables were reused.