We tested when added gain can reverse the agreement ranking of closed-eye alpha power and its closed/open ratio. We derived an exact condition for equal state gain variances and separable state and visit correlations. We used fixed posterior 8 to 13 Hz features from 60 and 38 adults. With independent visit gains, a finite reversal required state gain correlation above 0.783 and 0.897. With exactly shared state gains, visit correlation had to be below 0.482 and 0.414. The intervals were broad. The curves are ratios of expected ANOVA components, not expected sample ICCs. Gain was assumed, not estimated. The package preserves source spectra, code, bootstrap draws, proof, hashes, results, and reproduction instructions.
We tested a fixed predictive feature code for nine offline SEEG sound readers. The source was public OpenNeuro ds004703 v1.1.0. Six early passages per person set the reader and code. The test used 100 later passages and 11,700 reader outputs. Each update had eight four-bit values. An absolute reset occurred every ten updates. Other updates coded a residual from the decoded previous feature. At 32 payload bits per update, mean coding MSE fell from 0.001020439 to 0.001017249. This was a 0.31% decrease in the ratio of means. The equal-person mean paired change was -0.000003190. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was [-0.000084950, +0.000114688]. Seven people had less error and two had more. The test showed no clear mean decrease. It does not prove equal performance. Prediction had higher observed mean coding error than the parent reader-weight allocation code. Sound-target error did not show a clear decrease. All 154 feature files matched a fresh rebuild from pinned public source ranges. A separate scalar decoder checked all 800 packets. A separate-process repeat matched 1,632 result files exactly. The package contains input arrays, source receipts, code, packets, four figures, and repeat instructions. This is exploratory reuse of a small clinical cohort with shared sounds. The test assumes intact ordered transport and does not measure hardware power, intended speech, or stimulation.
We tested if correction of added power could reduce state reader error after six bit SEEG voltage coding. The test used OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2, eight people, 674 later trials, and 32 dither repeats. Each person had eight fixed bipolar pairs and a logistic reader trained on early native log power. The new method computed exact expected added power for a finite Hann periodogram with mean removal and exact-word exceptions. Under ideal independent uniform dither, subtraction lowers expected power square error before a floor or logarithm. In the test, 70 to 110 Hz normalized power square error fell from 0.29307 to 0.06224. Mean Brier error rose from 0.19345 to 0.19699. The equal person paired change was +0.00354, with a descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval of +0.00007 to +0.00949 and an exact two-sided sign-flip p value of 0.1094. These references do not establish a population increase. Buffers with a corrected feature at the fixed floor accounted for the observed mean increase. This was a diagnosis, not a causal floor test. The actual packets saved a mean 81.16% of bytes against an experimental float32 packet reference. A full analysis replay matched 5,728 arrays and all packet files. The package preserves compact source buffers, source versions and hashes, retrieval code, a proof, models, scores, packets, three figures, and inspection instructions. The study reused later trials from earlier work and tested one offline task-state reader and one fixed floor. It does not test live intent or brain stimulation.
We tested a last-response correction for the next SEEG pulse response at a known site. The public source was OpenNeuro ds004457 v1.0.2. The test used five patients, 183 sites, and 732 scored pulses. Each forecast and fitted weight used only complete earlier waveforms. At 20 to 100 ms, mean patient error reduction against all earlier responses was +5.93 percent. The descriptive 95 percent patient interval was −6.80 to +26.34 percent. Three sessions had more error; two had less error. Removing each patient’s largest-reference-error site changed the mean reduction to −5.00 percent. Separate recording contacts gave −2.66 percent. One site supplied 90.4 percent of patient 5’s benefit. Thus, the positive mean was sensitive to the measured signal set. We checked 110 raw source files and rebuilt every input exactly. The package preserves code, bins, input times, fitted weights, forecasts, losses, three figures, and repeat instructions. This offline result uses retrospective labels and reused patients. It does not establish a neural cause or live BCI benefit.
We tested recovery of a hidden SEEG shaft after stimulation in eight people from public OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. Five early pulses fit each model. All later pulses tested it. A new rule kept each donor score within its five-pulse fit range. At a fixed relative slope penalty of one, equal-person mean normalized error fell from 1.5230 to 1.2326 in the 20 to 500 ms window. The reduction was 19.1 percent, with a descriptive person bootstrap interval of 12.1 to 25.9 percent. Error fell in all eight people. The fixed template had error 1.1731. Clipped error remained 5.1 percent greater than template error. Correct pulse matching gave little benefit over shuffled donor input. The test had 317 conditions and 1,183 condition/readout instances. All 4,732 reused signal matrices matched a fresh raw reconstruction exactly. The package preserves code, matrices, source event maps, model coefficients, pulse errors, three figures, raw retrieval receipts, and checks. This was an offline test of simulated known shaft loss on reused people. It did not test future prediction, actual shaft failure, or a live BCI.
We tested recovery of a hidden SEEG shaft after stimulation in eight people from public OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. Five early pulses fit each model. All later pulses tested it. A new rule kept each donor score within its five-pulse fit range. At a fixed relative slope penalty of one, equal-person mean normalized error fell from 1.5230 to 1.2326 in the 20 to 500 ms window. The reduction was 19.1 percent, with a descriptive person bootstrap interval of 12.1 to 25.9 percent. Error fell in all eight people. The fixed template had error 1.1731. Clipped error remained 5.1 percent greater than template error. Correct pulse matching gave little benefit over shuffled donor input. The test had 317 conditions and 1,183 condition/readout instances. All 4,732 reused signal matrices matched a fresh raw reconstruction exactly. The package preserves code, matrices, source event maps, model coefficients, pulse errors, three figures, raw retrieval receipts, and checks. This was an offline test of simulated known shaft loss on reused people. It did not test future prediction, actual shaft failure, or a live BCI. This version corrects the file checker for metadata added by sci archive retrieval.
We tested the order of normalization and contact subtraction for an offline SEEG reader. We used public OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2, with 183 stimulation sites in five people with epilepsy. The first four pulses per site fitted each reader. The last four pulses tested it. At 20 to 100 ms, normalization after subtraction gave 35.7% mean person accuracy. Contact then pair normalization gave 25.9%, a loss in all five people. The two-sided whole-person sign-flip value was 0.0625. Both contact-normalized readers kept every label unchanged in the tested positive gain cases up to 20%. The real-arithmetic proof requires gains to stay constant within each response window. Stable labels did not give the highest accuracy under the prior adverse 5% gains. The package preserves a numerical failure near contact cancellation. It also preserves code, contact bins, source hashes, all gain vectors, fitted readers, checks, and three figures. A fresh download of 110 source files reproduced all input arrays and event fields. A second run reproduced all main tables and model arrays exactly. These digital tests do not establish clinical benefit, realistic gain limits, or prospective session performance.
We tested whether wrong stimulation site calls stayed near the true site in public SEEG data. We used OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2: five patients, 138 sites, and 15 fixed bipolar recording pairs. Four early pulses per site fitted a fixed covariance reader. Four later pulses tested it. At 20 to 100 ms, mean site accuracy was 33.71% and shaft accuracy was 60.39%. Among wrong calls, the share on the true shaft exceeded a uniform wrong-site reference by 22.99 percentage points after the pulse and 3.60 points before it. The paired increase was 19.40 points, with positive values in all five patients. A descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 8.37 to 30.06 points; the exact two-sided sign-flip reference was 0.0625. Shared stimulation contacts supplied 97.1% of this observed group increase. Separate pairs on the same shaft added only 0.56 points. The result supports a spatial error audit for stimulation feedback readers. It does not establish neural cause or live interface performance. The split was retrospective, site order was blocked, and these sessions had prior use. The package preserves every call, all fitted models, three figures, source code, data, and provenance. A fresh raw rebuild matched all 2,453,000 voltage bins and all event fields. A separate numerical replay matched all results exactly.
We tested whether absolute cosine improves site identification after recorded stimulation contact order reversal. We used public STReEF SEEG data from eight patients with epilepsy. Each patient supplied four sites, four recording pairs, and five fit pulses per site. Testing used 160 separate pulses in total. The feature window was 20 to 100 ms. Signed cosine gave 100 correct decisions; absolute cosine gave 91. Mean accuracy decreased from 62.5% to 56.9%. The exact paired patient test gave p = 0.125. Absolute scoring gained seven correct answers and lost sixteen. Artificial global sign changes left all absolute decisions fixed. Recorded order reversal did not produce a uniform global response sign change. Only 40 test pulses occurred after all fitting pulses for their patient. The sample and earlier signed results were known. The result does not establish a population effect or live BCI performance. We preserve three figures, code, fitted readers, pulse decisions, source hashes, and reproduction instructions. Fresh retrieval matched all 320 raw epochs. A new Python environment repeated the analysis and matched the preserved inputs and results.
We tested a sign guard for one audit pulse from a known stimulation site. We used five public SEEG sessions from OpenNeuro ds004457, version 1.0.2. The guard uses a metric fixed from calibration pulses. Each template projection must exceed a stated additive error bound in magnitude. The proof shows that accepted signs must agree with the error-free audit under that bound. All 13,526 accepted main window cases with simulated nonzero error met this condition. Directed errors at the planned radius changed signs in four selected audits. The guard rejected all four. A site rule based on calibration template length accepted 61.09% of cases at the planned metric radius of 8. The inherited consistency rule accepted 59.49%. The mean paired difference was 1.60 percentage points across five sessions. An exact descriptive sign-flip test gave p = 0.50. These data do not give clear evidence of a general selection benefit. The certificate does not prove physical wiring signs or correct site predictions. A valid device error bound remains necessary. Only 27 of 549 source targets followed all fit pulses and the selected audit. No live interface was tested. The package preserves the proof, code, voltage bins, source hashes, results, figures, and a checked raw retrieval recipe.
We tested response correlations in eight patients from OpenNeuro STReEF ds005448 v1.0.0. Each patient had four local stimulation sites and four selected recording pairs. Five earlier pulses per site fitted the readers, and five later pulses tested them after recorded contact order reversal. The readers used identical pairs, site means, and marginal feature scales. At 50% correlation weight, correct labels changed from 115 to 116 of 160. The equal-patient mean change was +0.625 percentage points, with a 95% patient bootstrap interval of −1.875 to +3.125 points. Feature-position permutation controls had nearly the same mean accuracy as the fitted correlations. The result gives no clear evidence of a gain from full correlations in this short fitting task and does not establish equal performance. This exploratory analysis reuses a cohort and does not test online brain-computer interface control.
We tested whether recorded stimulation contact order reversal removes site information from the recording schedule. We used public STReEF SEEG data from eight patients with epilepsy. Each patient supplied 12 distinct stimulation sites. Five pulses per site fit the rules. Five separate pulses per site tested the rules, with the recorded contact order reversed. The label from the nearest fit-pulse time was correct in 388 of 480 tests, or 80.8 percent. Uniform guessing gives 8.3 percent expected accuracy. The label from the latest earlier fit pulse was correct in all 480 tests. Only 40 tests, or 8.3 percent, followed all fit pulses in the same patient run. Those later tests represented only one site per patient. In a matched four-site subset, pulse time gave 98.8 percent accuracy, and a voltage reader at 20 to 100 ms gave 71.9 percent. The split retained strong schedule information. This does not prove that the voltage reader used time or that a neural response was absent. The package supplies a reusable schedule audit, exact local time prediction intervals, three figures, all predictions, source code, pinned data records, and reproduction instructions. All 320 retrieved voltage epochs matched their source hashes. The rebuilt features and clean numerical replays matched exactly. This is an exploratory offline audit of reused clinical records. It does not establish a live brain-computer interface benefit.
Known positive probabilities gave zero expected bias for finite-window SEEG power under the specified simulated gap rule. The test used two public rest recordings and 16 contact pairs per person. Each packet kept an anchor. It removed four other samples with a probability set by that anchor. The main band was 70 to below 140 Hz. Bins from 98 to below 102 Hz were excluded. The test used 128 masks per pair and test second. Logged correction had greater root mean squared error than linear interpolation in every selected pair. For one-second outputs, error divided by complete pair mean power was 142.86 and 172.42 for correction. The interpolation ratios were 0.237 and 0.311. Ten-second averaging reduced correction error, but interpolation still gave lower error. The package includes the proof, derived data, retrieval code, tables, four figures, and independent checks. A separate replay reproduced all numerical results exactly. The test used simulated gaps in rest data. It did not test real stimulation, task decoding, or patient benefit.
We tested whether a centered coordinate median reduces errors from wrong stimulation-site labels in a four-pulse fit. Public OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2 supplied five SEEG sessions, 183 sites, 732 fit pulses, and 732 separate test pulses. Each site had one wrong fit label in 64 draws per patient. Each draw reassigned recorded fit pulses and preserved all voltages. Both readers used the same mean-residual covariance fitted from the changed labels. At 20 to 100 ms, the median raised equal patient accuracy from 30.88% to 32.34%, a gain of 1.47 percentage points. Four patients gained and one lost. With clean labels, accuracy fell from 40.56% to 37.99%, a loss of 2.57 points. All five patients had a clean loss. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval for the error gain was 0.25 to 3.05 points. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip value was 0.125. This small sample does not establish a population gain. The package provides a fixed calibration-label benchmark, three figures, voltage bins, all label maps and decisions, models, code, source hashes, and repeat instructions. Fresh raw extraction matched the input arrays. Direct analysis of the rebuilt inputs matched all 22 numerical files. An independent calculation matched all 566,568 saved decisions. These repeated decisions are not independent observations. The clinical cohort was reused. Only 36 test pulses occurred after all site fits. The study does not test a live BCI, real label faults, or a unique neural signal.
We tested a template delay search for response monitoring with public SEEG voltage from eight patients and 86 stimulation sites. Five early pulses fixed each readout pair, template, and threshold. Five later pulses supplied the test data. We imposed integer timing errors from -20 to +20 samples at 2048 Hz. The primary AUC used independent discrete uniform errors for the compared after and before windows. Mean AUC was 0.9348 for a fixed template and 0.9363 for a search over 41 delays. The paired difference was 0.00155. Its 95% patient bootstrap interval was -0.00101 to +0.00445; the patient sign-flip test gave p = 0.390625. The test did not establish a positive mean effect or equivalence. Search background calls rose from 14.1% to 17.5% when the search used the fixed-score threshold. A threshold fitted with the search gave 14.0% background calls. The errors were simulated. No natural clock error or live BCI benefit was measured. The package preserves voltage inputs, all scores, code, source hashes, verification records, and three figures. This study reused a clinical cohort and prior readout choices. Fresh checks passed for all eight complete source voltage files.
We tested whether a fixed full noise covariance matrix improves reading of stimulation sites with a small SEEG calibration set. We used public OpenNeuro ds005448 data from eight patients. Each reader used four recording pairs, four known sites, and five fit pulses per site. Test pulses used the reversed stimulation contact order. Full covariance and a matched diagonal rule each made 117 correct decisions in 160 test pulses, or 73.1%. Their mean patient difference was zero. The descriptive patient bootstrap interval was -2.5 to 2.5 percentage points. Two patients improved, two became worse, and four had equal correct counts. This offline result does not establish equivalence or performance in a new session. Fit and test times interleaved across sites. We rebuilt all 320 source epochs from pinned public ranges. The package preserves features, models, code, three figures, source records, and checked reproduction instructions.
We tested whether an early energy forecast can use slopes learned only from other people. We used public STReEF SEEG data from eight people with epilepsy. The fixed sample had 96 conditions and 960 pulses. Five local pulses set each recording pair's means. Calibration pulses from the other seven people set the shared slopes. Five later pulses tested each condition at reversed stimulation contact order. Adding 20 to 100 ms energy to before-pulse energy reduced mean squared log energy error for the 100 to 500 ms target by 11.1 percent. Error fell from 0.768629 to 0.683271. All eight people had lower error. The mean error change was -0.08536. A descriptive 95 percent person bootstrap interval with donor refits was -0.12967 to -0.05136. Error was also 14.3 percent below a fixed calibration forecast. A control before stimulation also improved. The result supports transfer of this fixed forecast rule within a reused clinical cohort. It does not identify a stimulation-specific neural signal or test an online interface. Earlier work already showed a gain with slopes fitted within these people. This package adds the other-person training test. It preserves window energy data, forecasts, figures, code, source versions and hashes, raw audit blocks, and a streamed retrieval recipe.
We tested contact selection and rank cutoffs in public SEEG from eight patients with epilepsy. The test used 86 stimulation sites, five early calibration pulses, and five later test pulses. The main feature was 4–30 Hz Hann energy from 100 to 500 ms after a pulse, with matched before-pulse windows. One rule reused five backgrounds to select one bipolar pair and set its cutoff. The other rule refitted pair selection for each of six rank roles. With equal person weights, refitting reduced background calls from 28.19% to 19.69% and pulse calls from 70.75% to 60.62%. Net calls fell by 1.64 percentage points; the 95% paired person bootstrap interval was −4.67 to 1.61. Thus the test showed no clear net gain. In independent Gamma noise, selection reuse raised background calls as candidate count rose. A symmetric rank bound requires conditional exchangeability, which these patient data do not establish. The archive preserves inputs, code, all decisions, four figures, source checks, and reproduction instructions; the GPL code is omitted from the SCI payload. The cohort was reused. The reader requires query data from all candidate pairs.
One pulse from a known stimulation site restored signed reader decisions in five public SEEG sessions from OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. The site was selected with calibration pulses only. All 549 target decisions stayed fixed under every tested output sign pattern. A proof covers nonzero constant signed output gains shared by audit and test. Accuracy was 34.82%, compared with 33.07% for an absolute-score reader with no audit. The mean difference was 1.75 percentage points; the exact five-session sign-flip test gave p = 0.25. A random audit site gave 25.82%. Only 27 targets occurred after all calibration and selected audit pulses. Thus this is an offline recording-fault test. It does not establish live BCI performance or a neural cause of site information. The package preserves figures, all candidate audit results, models, code, source metadata, and retrieval instructions. All 110 source file hashes and a fresh voltage-bin rebuild matched. A separate run matched the saved tables and model arrays.
We tested beta power estimates in 36 selected patients from public OpenNeuro SEEG data. We simulated independent gaps of about 50 ms every 250 ms. Pair inclusion correction gave lower normalized squared error than rescaled zero filling in all patients. The median patient error ratio was 0.157. Linear interpolation gave lower error than pair correction in 34 patients. Corrected beta estimates were negative in 7.62% of estimates with equal patient weight. A large source transient dominated the planned group mean. We retained it and reported patient ratios and a separate sensitivity check. A proof gives an exact mean identity under the stated mask law. This identity does not ensure low error or positive power for one buffer. The package preserves 72 source-checked input arrays, code, source versions, a retrieval recipe, scores, figures, and replay checks. The study tests simulated data loss. It does not test stimulation or clinical performance.