This method demonstration tests whether race-model simulations that preserve adaptive stop-signal delay feedback can provide task-structured references for negative local mean reaction-time gaps. It uses 266 event files from OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0, identified by the recorded Git commit and file hashes. In recorded data, 241 runs pass a prespecified screen; 90 screened runs have at least one negative quarter, and 29 have at least one negative half. In 4,096 simulated evaluations, the mean negative-quarter reference count ranges from 53.406 to 53.724 under a constant STOP completion-time law and from 96.238 to 97.533 under a gamma law with shape 4, across fixed and adaptive delay policies. The tested STOP law changes these conditional reference counts more than the tested policy comparison. Fourteen of 1,064 fitted means reach a search limit. All reported references depend on the observed schedules, empirical GO distributions, fitted response targets, and model assumptions. The work does not select a correct STOP law, estimate stop-signal reaction time, establish biological causality, or provide a calibrated biological significance test. Parameter uncertainty, timing error, deadlines, trigger failure, and time-varying or arrow-specific GO distributions are not modeled.
Filters: arxiv: stat.ME (Methodology) ×
We tested whether public gender Stroop schedules can separate a congruency sequence interaction from an image-category by word-category repetition interaction. The source was AOMIC PIOP1, OpenNeuro ds002785 version 2.0.0. All 19,665 adjacent pairs in 207 available runs obeyed an exact binary identity. Shared event timing and a common linear signal transform preserved it. Separate coefficients were not estimable in any of 1,242 tested trial and constructed scan models. Their sum was estimable in every complete scheduled model. Removal of both category repetitions left no cI or iC pairs. A secondary response time analysis in 198 eligible people gave a mean sequence score of 21.954 ms and a 95% person bootstrap interval of 9.847 to 34.227 ms. This association does not identify a control mechanism. The binary feature concern is established knowledge. This method package adds a complete source-specific audit, exact null vectors, and a reusable contrast check tool. It preserves source files, fixed retrieval records, every matrix, code, results, and instructions. A fresh source replay matched all 1,476 numerical files byte for byte. We did not analyze measured brain images.
This sensitivity study builds on a public four-component auditory repeat-fit benchmark. Separate studies supplied SEEG high-gamma amplitude and BOLD fMRI for 165 sounds. Two patients and four MRI adults supplied development. A local lock fixed amplitude scale 0.25 before new endpoints in six other patients and 16 other MRI adults. Mean error gains over one direction were 1.3938 and 7.9936 points of training energy. Person 95% Student limits were [-0.0070,2.7947] and [6.9604,9.0268]. Five of six patients and all MRI adults had positive gains. The shared rule failed because the SEEG lower limit crossed zero. Added MRI gains do not supply missing electrical confirmation. A repaired search found the closest prior study after the new endpoints. An exploratory replay matched its six original SEEG scores exactly. Subtracting each trial's 100 ms pre-onset mean reduced that prior pipeline's mean normalized gain from 2.7422 to 0.2712 points of test energy, a 90.11% decrease. All six adjusted gains remained positive. With fixed coordinates, baseline subtraction raised target energy 4.24 to 8.20 times and left mean added gain uncertain. These changes do not select a correct baseline or measure lost neural information. Fixed controls, joint subject-and-sound refits, and all negative outcomes remain. A second exact rank-one noise example extends a known interpretation limit to the changed fit. An earlier fine-identity plan stopped before neural scores when its order check failed. Code, source pins and terms, results, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Different cohorts, source selection, repeat dependence and measurement filters limit scope. No causal or shared biological rank claim is established.
We tested whether three sound-group mean response patterns need more than one fixed linear spatial direction. Separate public studies supplied human SEEG high-gamma and BOLD fMRI. Two patients and four MRI adults supplied pilot data. A local code lock preceded scores in six other patients and 16 other adults. Eight adults from a second fMRI study supplied an added check. The groups contained 128 nonvoice sounds, nine other human voices and 28 speech or song sounds. One repeat set scales and axes. Two other repeats tested a signed minor. All 30 person scores were positive. The SEEG mean was 0.11420, with 95% person Student limits [-0.01503, 0.24344]. The two MRI means were 0.30431 [0.24055, 0.36808] and 0.32785 [0.25533, 0.40036]. The single shared rule also required a positive electrical score difference from pre-onset data. Its combined one-sided probability was 0.03651, but the required positive lower interval limits failed. Joint sound and person resampling also crossed zero in SEEG. Thus the fixed test did not confirm cross-modal generalization. The established minor has zero expected value for a rank-one mean under independent zero-mean full repeat errors. Source selection across repeats can break that model. A constructed rank-zero screen gave mean 0.45832. A nonlinear scalar input also gave a positive score. Neither neural rank nor a common cause is established. The package gives code, source pins and terms, all outcomes, figures, audits and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external.
We tested how removal of response times changes information about stop time. We used all 226 task designs in OpenNeuro ds002790 version 2.0.0. Each model has a known finite go law and an independent nonnegative stop law. The target is the mean stop time capped at 500 ms. Exact response probabilities are treated as known. We proved sharp finite programs for each recorded summary. The median largest possible target range was 23.87 ms with outcomes at each delay. It was 5.00 ms with 100 ms response time bins at each delay. The range decreased in 223 of 226 designs. The median paired percentage decrease was 77.36 percent. Full response times gave a median largest range of 4.00 ms. The additional checks use the first 90 designs in source order. Source hash checks and numerical certificate checks are preserved. The first 90 primary designs were repeated from fresh source files. These are model information limits. They do not estimate human stop times or finite-sample precision.
We tested whether the rarest word improves neural prediction beyond additive lexical frequency measures. Separate public reading studies supplied ECoG and fMRI. A local code lock preceded new scores in five ECoG patients and eight reserved MRI participants. Mean gains were -2.234% and -0.171% of null loss. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-4.215,-0.254]% and [-0.490,+0.148]%. The shared positive rule failed, p=1. Baseline prediction was weak. An exact design audit found a different shared result. The word-count matrices had full row rank: 52 of 52 ECoG sentences, 243 of 243 and 384 of 384 MRI sentences, and 627 of 627 in the MRI union. Hence every sentence response vector, including noise, has an additive word fit if word effects have no bounds and can differ between neural sites. Any test response vector can coexist with fixed training responses. Nonnegative effects do not restore a test if the intercept is free. Exact modular certificates and fits to all finite site records checked these statements. Minimum coefficient bounds were 2.967-6.056 and 3.356-5.056 network standard deviations under a stated scale. The original ECoG word rows retain 153 residual dimensions after word identity, position and source-order control; sentence averaging leaves none. A new four-sentence design cancels all fixed word effects but permits a maximum-rule contrast in a model example. No participant saw that design. This is a method contribution and a negative cross-modal benchmark, not evidence for an additive brain code, absent composition, or causality. Code, source pins and terms, all results, exact certificates, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Source arrays and frequency tables stay external.
We tested whether TCP Stroop records can estimate a sequence term separately from complete repetition pattern effects. We used all 445 runs from 226 people in OpenNeuro ds005237 version 1.1.3. Each trial uses three color names. The model gives each observed nonzero four-bit equality pattern a free effect. The no-overlap pattern has effect zero. Exact null vectors show that the separate sequence coefficient is not identifiable. No pair of two incongruent trials has disjoint names. A common linear transform preserves the dependence. Exhaustive four-name designs pass the audit. The primary descriptive mean was 47.17 ms in 212 selected people. Its 95 percent person bootstrap interval was 25.68 to 68.54 ms. After removal of repetitions within the same role, the mean was -28.28 ms in 208 people. In the primary sample, assumed pattern shifts of up to 16.91 ms permit a zero adjusted mean. These data do not measure those shifts or identify a control mechanism. The package contains a general audit tool, proof, 894 pinned source files, all results, resampling records, figures, and reproduction commands. Fresh source checks passed. All 40 numeric result files matched a full rerun. The general repetition problem is established. This work supplies the TCP audit and a checked method.
Time averaging can hide a scalar with fixed monotone readouts. We give an exact construction for any finite real mean map with free readout offsets, ranges and condition-specific dwell times. P coordinates need at most P+1 fixed scalar states. The universal finite-state bound is sharp. A range formula is exact within a one-jump threshold family. Separate public studies supplied SEEG from eight patients and fMRI from 28 adults. Fixed eight-site panels had 165 sound means per person. Nine states reproduced all maps within 9.42e-16 of each coordinate mean range. Reserved applications used six patients, 16 B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. Mean required range factors were 4.3515, 4.3490 and 3.9520. Independent time integrals and integer programs checked all 36 fits. An exact positive-output example had crossed mean orders, nonzero area and zero repeat variance. A stricter check froze readers from repeat 0. It failed on at least one later sound in 29 of 30 reserved people. Later weights used later outcomes, so this was not prediction. The result is a measurement limit and a checked tool. It does not establish one-dimensional brain activity, a shared neural code or causality. Condition-driven dwell times retain model complexity. Different cohorts, clinical sampling, source screens, filters, time scales and vascular effects limit biological interpretation. The package supplies code, proof, source pins and terms, all scalar results, figures and repeat instructions. Neural arrays remain external.
We tested whether one learned speech/song direction retains more than half of a nonspeech human voice mean contrast. Separate public studies supplied SEEG high-gamma amplitude and BOLD fMRI. One repeat fitted a direction without voice clips. Two other repeats supplied total and projected contrast products. Three rotations gave one score per person. A local plan preceded new scores in six patients and 16 MRI adults. The primary shared test failed, p=0.983741. Mean projected minus half-total energy was -0.006778 [-0.012718,-0.000838] in SEEG and +0.001210 [-0.006548,+0.008968] in fMRI. Brackets give 95% independent-person Student limits in squared calibration-SD units per site. Ratios of mean energies were 0.306 and 0.508. An added study of eight MRI adults gave 0.490. These ratios have descriptive status. Mean projected and residual scores had positive pointwise limits in both primary studies. Those components do not rescue the failed claim. Keeping spatial means changed concentration. Joint person and sound resampling crossed zero for the SEEG projected score and half margin. Known models gave residual energy with parallel true contrasts, and positive scores with shared repeat errors or future-based selection. Thus no common majority-energy transfer was confirmed, and residuals cannot count neural sources. Clinical sampling, source screens, measurement filters, separate cohorts, fixed sounds and the chosen metric limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all results, negative checks, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original neural arrays stay external.
We tested whether one fixed scalar per sound can explain measured response means through monotone site functions. Separate public studies supplied human SEEG and BOLD fMRI. A local code lock preceded new scores in six patients and eight MRI adults. The 165-sound minimum test failed, with shared p=1. All person scores were negative. A 16-adult MRI extension also failed. This does not confirm a scalar model. We give a finite sign-test guarantee under conditional symmetric errors. We also apply a two-repeat Gaussian product correction. It is unbiased under independent equal-covariance Gaussian errors. Exact finite quadrature checked the formula. Dependent, unequal-covariance, and non-Gaussian errors can break it. This later exploratory estimator gave mean -0.013174 in SEEG, -0.199779 in the eight-adult MRI sample, and +0.859833 in the 16-adult MRI sample. Only the last person interval was positive. A source audit found identical spatial mean profiles across people in both MRI releases, and across scans in the original NH2015 matrix. Thus separate source records do not establish independent released errors. No positive cross-modal neural claim is confirmed. The package preserves code, source pins and terms, every scored result, model checks, figures, and repeat instructions. Original neural arrays stay external.
We tested whether sound responses have a positive mean spatial area in separate human SEEG and fMRI studies. A single fixed linear response direction has zero expected corrected area under independent errors across sound and repeat observations. We used disjoint contrasts among 128 fixed source nonvoice sounds per study. One repeat set site scales; two other repeats supplied a quartic area estimate. No fitted response direction or common reference person entered the score. A local code lock preceded reserved endpoint scores. Six SEEG patients had mean 0.002810, with 95% person Student limits [0.000255, 0.005365]. Sixteen fMRI adults had mean 0.042440 [0.029782, 0.055098]. The fixed shared gate passed, one-sided p=0.018388 at threshold 0.025. One patient was negative. Eight adults from a separate fMRI study had mean 0.030627 [0.016391, 0.044863]. All studies had uncertain first-sixteen-site checks. Joint person and sound reweighting crossed zero in SEEG. An exact sum replaces 256032000 ordered quartet evaluations with quadratic work after Gram formation. Direct enumeration and independent contrast calculations checked it. Models showed positive area under rank-one site selection and under rank-zero errors related across sounds. The human results therefore concern the stated measured preparations; they do not establish two neural sources or a cause. Clinical sampling, different cohorts and filters, source selection, fixed sounds and small electrical n limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all scores, negative checks, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original neural arrays stay external.
We tested whether human auditory response means can share one scalar order. Separate public studies supplied SEEG and BOLD fMRI. One repeat selected three-sound conflicts. Two others tested the smallest of four signed comparisons. Development used two patients and four MRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 B2021 adults and eight adults from a separate MRI study. Individual-sound mean scores were -0.8663, -0.3401 and -0.4980 selection SD units. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-1.0162,-0.7164], [-0.4253,-0.2550] and [-0.6067,-0.3893]. All 30 scores were negative. A development-led class-mean test also failed. Both shared claims had Holm p=1. All sensitivity and sound-refit results remain. We add a sufficient central-symmetry condition for a whole-person sign reference. An exact scalar null with unbiased asymmetric errors gave positive scores with probability 0.748. This is a sign-reference limit, not a human error estimate or a false-positive rate for the complete rule. Another exact example shows that class averaging can create order conflicts from one monotone scalar. Source screens used all repeats, so the conditional error assumptions are not established in the human data. Clinical sampling, different cohorts, finite sounds, reference and measurement filters limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all results, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original neural arrays remain external. No positive cross-modal neural result or causal effect was confirmed.
We tested a measurement limit for neural response variation. Two stimulus mixtures gave equal probabilities for all eight ordered sets of three Bernoulli repeats. After a fixed origin shift, both true mean responses averaged to zero. Yet covariance of true response energy and repeat variance was +0.00405 in one model and -0.00658125 in the other. These values attain sharp bounds at the shared first three moments. Independent Gaussian measurement noise preserves the equal laws and opposite signs. Thus more stimuli alone cannot identify the sign in this unrestricted family. Four independent repeats permit a distribution-free covariance moment under stable means. We also tested a narrower signed three-repeat estimator in separate public human studies. Development used two SEEG patients and four fMRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients and 16 other adults. Mean corrected covariances were 0.0003025 and 0.00314996 in distinct source-cubed units. Their 95% person Student limits included zero. Positive counts were 5/6 and 11/16. The single shared sign rule failed, p=0.109375. Eight adults from another MRI study also gave an uncertain result. Joint person and sound refit ranges included zero in all three groups. An exact third-moment identity explains why pooling can raise or lower this signed statistic. Source normalization, selection, changing means and repeat dependence limit latent interpretation. No positive cross-modal neural effect or cause was confirmed. The package supplies proofs, code, source pins and terms, all results, figures and repeat steps. Original neural arrays stay external.
We tested whether two response directions repeat between people for 128 source nonvoice sounds per study. Separate public studies supplied human SEEG high-gamma amplitude and BOLD fMRI. Two patients and four MRI adults supplied fixed references. A local code lock preceded new scores in six other patients and 24 other MRI adults from two studies. One repeat set site scales and two paired directions. Other repeats gave a signed area score. Mean scores were 0.000034397, 0.00299704 and 0.00205993. Their pointwise 95% person Student limits were [0.000006421,0.000062372], [0.00241292,0.00358117] and [0.00127203,0.00284783]. All 30 target scores were positive. The fixed conditional mean-and-majority rule passed, p=0.025078. An added reference-and-target bootstrap crossed zero in SEEG. Neither single-patient reference passed the full rule. A 24-site electrical check was uncertain. An exact model had a rank-one true cross-map and independent repeat errors. Common reference noise made the person-only rule pass in half its sign-paired draws. This is an interpretation limit, not a human fit. The contribution is a checked tool, a conditional cross-modal benchmark and a reference-error limit. It does not establish two shared neural sources. Clinical sampling, source screens, different cohorts, shared schedules, remaining acoustics and signal filters limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all aggregate outcomes, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Source neural arrays stay external.
We tested whether acoustic correction improves short maps of auditory class means. Separate public studies supplied human iEEG voltage and BOLD fMRI. Four patients and four MRI adults supplied development. A local code lock preceded new endpoint scores in 21 patients and 16 other MRI adults. Each panel used four sounds per class across five classes. A split acoustic rule corrected each half using slopes fit on the other half. Mean error gains were 0.224% in iEEG and 0.568% in primary fMRI. Their 95% person Student limits were [0.106,0.341]% and [0.526,0.610]%. Mean electrical skill versus one common calibration estimate was -61.586%, with limits [-89.192,-33.981]%. MRI skill was +42.396% [39.775,45.017]%. The shared gain-and-skill rule failed, p=0.999980. An added exact finite-library calculation compared ordinary class means with the common estimate. At four sounds per class, ordinary means had greater expected error in 19 of 21 electrical patients and none of 24 MRI adults from two studies. A closed form rule gave every feasible count threshold and oracle shrinkage factor. The added calculation is exploratory and conditional on the fixed processed tables. It does not identify a causal modality difference. Baseline subtraction left electrical gain uncertain. A one-site MRI control had negative skill. Full sound deletions, every negative result, direct regression checks and exact small-table enumeration remain. The package provides a checked estimation tool and negative cross-modal accuracy benchmark. It does not confirm a positive biological generalization, absent class coding, or prospective time savings. Code, permitted inputs, source pins and terms, full results, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original MRI arrays stay external.
We tested whether large sound-group response contrasts have large repeat variation. Separate public human studies supplied SEEG high-gamma amplitude and BOLD fMRI. Each person supplied 24 selected sites and three response estimates. One repeat set contrast energy; the other two set variation. We also tested a pooled rule that reused all repeats in both quantities. Development used two patients and four MRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients and 16 other adults. Mean separated partial rank relations were 0.012 [-0.032, 0.057] and 0.007 [-0.019, 0.034]. Brackets give 95% person Student limits. The fixed shared positive-relation test failed, Holm p=0.28604. Mean pooled-minus-separated changes were 0.554 [0.454, 0.654] and 0.639 [0.587, 0.692]. All 22 changes were positive. The fixed shared change test passed, Holm p=0.03125. Another MRI acquisition gave a positive change in eight people. Source authors report separate MRI cohorts. Full sound and person refits test panel sensitivity. An exact zero-signal Gaussian model gives pooled correlation sqrt(2/3). Two other energy definitions give zero and -1/sqrt(3). Human energy-definition checks are exploratory. A variable-error model gives a positive separated relation with no true signal. We supply a model-only four-repeat design check. The result is a controlled estimator benchmark, not evidence for a common neural cause or unstable neural representations. All negative outcomes, code, new scalar statistics, source pins and terms, figures and repeat steps remain.
We derived a sharp error bound for a prior signed response area test. It subtracts eta/[4(1-eta)] times repeat disagreement. The bound needs a common response mean, zero conditional error means after training and selection, and two bounded cross-error moments. It allows unequal variances and non-Gaussian errors. Separate public studies supplied eight SEEG patients and two fMRI groups. The MRI groups had 20 and eight adults. A local code lock preceded new scores. At eta=0.10, mean margins were +0.043791, +0.257556 and +0.091270. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-0.015121,0.102703], [0.188065,0.327048] and [0.042209,0.140331]. The fixed shared test failed; two-claim Holm p was 0.113720. The unadjusted shared test also failed. Positive controls did not replace these failures. An added exploratory test used cyclic differences of three repeats. All 36 resulting margins were positive, with means +0.204276, +0.160672 and +0.089573. An exact rank-zero Gaussian model explains why this control can fail: the two test differences sum to the negative training difference. Its expected adjusted margin was 0.143333 in a stated example. The new contribution is the sharp bound, its sensitivity tool, a negative human benchmark and a checked difference-control failure. Source screens can violate the required conditional means. Thus no shared neural rank or cause is established. Code, source pins and terms, all outcomes, figures, plans, audits and repeat instructions are supplied. Original neural arrays remain external. Student tests can have incorrect rejection rates. A skewed rank-zero model rejected 7.2% of 10000 eight-person null groups at a nominal 5% level.
We tested whether a nearer acoustic neighbor from another sound class has a larger cortical response difference than a same-class neighbor. The fixed rule also required a larger mean effect in selected association than early auditory parcels. Separate public studies supplied signed LFP responses and BOLD fMRI. Four MRI adults supplied development. The fixed tests used 14 patients after baseline subtraction and 16 other MRI adults. Both shared rules failed after Holm correction, p=1. With five classes, mean association scores were 0.07944 in iEEG and 0.24854 in fMRI. Their 95% person Student limits were [-0.02537,0.18426] and [0.22310,0.27397]. The electrical regional difference was uncertain. A check in eight adults from another MRI study left the regional difference uncertain when the source voice class was omitted. All negative people and failed checks remain. An added model audit gives the exact score range over noiseless linear acoustic tuning. Every library and panel had a positive acoustic-only upper bound. Some measured scores exceeded the ten-axis range. All 152 regional scalars were inside the full-descriptor ranges with unrestricted weights and could be matched one scalar at a time. Those post-analysis matches do not fit full neural responses or predict new sounds. The contribution is a fixed negative benchmark and a checked acoustic range tool. No positive cross-modal neural effect or causal claim was confirmed. Separate cohorts, clinical sampling, source screens, unequal errors and measurement filters limit scope. Code, licensed compact inputs, source pins and terms, all results, figures and repeat steps are supplied.
We tested whether class examples improve auditory response forecasts after a fixed acoustic match. Separate public studies supplied signed iEEG field means and BOLD fMRI. Four people per study supplied development. A local code lock preceded new scores in 14 other patients and 16 other adults. Each forecast used 16 common calibration sounds and four examples. The control used four non-class examples matched on ten acoustic axes. Mean association gains were 6.640 and 17.346 reference-error points. Their 95% person Student limits were [3.075,10.205] and [16.665,18.028]. All reserved people had positive gains. A shared gain and skill test passed two-claim Holm correction, p=0.00144670. Eight adults from another MRI study gave a 16.156-point mean gain on the same MRI sounds. The original acoustic-fit hierarchy test failed, p=0.43139648. Development prompted the added mean-forecast test. Pre-event subtraction retained a positive electrical mean gain. The early electrical window was uncertain. Exact acoustic-only examples gave either gain sign. They were not fit to human responses. Matching was limited and did not give equal acoustic geometry. Separate cohorts, two sound libraries, source screens, sparse clinical coverage and different signal filters limit scope. No semantic code or common neural cause was established. Code, operators, permitted inputs, all losses, source checks, negative results and repeat steps are included.
We tested whether errors from reference people improve response prediction sets in other people. Separate public human studies supplied signed iEEG LFP means and BOLD fMRI. Five patients and four MRI adults supplied reference errors. A local code lock preceded tests in 20 other patients and 16 other adults. One rule used class error scales. A second used sound-specific scales. Both recalibrated an 80% map-error radius and kept the same acoustic point forecast. Proper radius loss penalized wide sets and misses. Mean class gains were -0.109% and +3.770%, with 95% person Student limits [-0.234,+0.015]% and [+3.054,+4.486]%. Added item gains were -0.545% and +1.207%. Both shared tests failed Holm correction, p=1. Mean coverage stayed near 81% in both modalities. An added study used eight other MRI adults, the same sounds and unchanged B2021 references. The B2021 item-gain range included zero when reference people and sounds were resampled. All negative people and fixed checks remain. The contribution is a tool to score prediction sets and a failed shared benchmark. It does not establish a common neural mechanism, causality or transfer to unknown sound libraries. Sparse clinical coverage, different cohorts and labels, source screens, unequal site counts and measurement filters limit scope. Code, permitted inputs, source versions and terms, all results, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original MRI site arrays and audio remain external.